Earlier quoted context omitted.
> they have rug-pulled people with a hard fork. "People" here being criminals that exploited a flaw in the DAO, yeah?
Just like how the US financial system only freezes the assets of Bad Guys, right? As for GME? We had to rugpull them because they were manipulating the market[1]. [1] Yes I know that wasn't the real reason why trading was halted
Signal adds a payments feature with a privacy-focused cryptocurrency
331–340 of 665 posts
Re: Signal adds a payments feature with a privacy-focused cryptocurrency
#332Long-time Signal user here, with a number of technical and non-technical friends, colleagues and acquaintances who also use it. I don't know who was asking for this. And I think it really dilutes Signal's message. I believe that everyone has a fundamental right to secure, private communication. Some people may hold the same belief for the right to transfer funds. I don't agree and I suspect many others feel the same.…
No one has the right of secure comms (why do you use Signal and encrypt messages if you have that right?). Anyone has the right to privacy on their own property (on your land, at home, etc.) but not outside.
The totally premined coin is very scammy.
Re: Signal adds a payments feature with a privacy-focused cryptocurrency
#333Re: Signal adds a payments feature with a privacy-focused cryptocurrency
#334Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tried going to https://buymobilecoin.com/ as referenced in https://www.mobilecoin.com/terms-of-sale.html but get a Cloudflare "Error 1020" page. What's up with that?
This occurs when you try to access it from a US-IP.
Re: Signal adds a payments feature with a privacy-focused cryptocurrency
#335Earlier quoted context omitted.
That was my first thought as well. Why didn't they pick Monero? I don't see how any other coin could be better.
No near-instant confirmation, maybe. At first glance not a big problem for users, but can run you into a lot of problems
Re: Signal adds a payments feature with a privacy-focused cryptocurrency
#336Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just like how the US financial system only freezes the assets of Bad Guys, right? As for GME? We had to rugpull them because they were manipulating the market[1]. [1] Yes I know that wasn't the real reason why trading was halted
I don't know enough to comment on those things, I'm discussing the specific example of the ETH fork which was given.
Re: Signal adds a payments feature with a privacy-focused cryptocurrency
#337The comment from the article echos my own sentiments: > Speaking solely as a person who is really into encrypted messaging, it terrifies me that they're going to take this really clean story of an encrypted messenger and mix it up with the nightmare of laws and regulations and vulnerability that is cryptocurrency. Moreover, there are three other points I'd add: 1. I don't like "do everything" apps like WeChat or Line…
> Early in Signal's development they would add privacy features. Lately they have been adding social features. This is intentional and relates to Signal's growth in the past few years. It's not "a hacker tool for nerds" it's "a friendly, easy to use chat app with stickers & voice messages (also strong encryption)." IRC does one thing and does it well, and barely anyone uses it. The "clean technical vision" story isn'…
Except it's not, strong encryption and privacy emphasis goes against easy to use. I recently got my family to switch to Telegram (because I like the interface) - my sister works in an environment where she has to have a separate work phone without a camera and everything synced up out of the box, history, etc. Brother lost his phone - same thing, has chat histories and everything is back to normal. I use Telegram on desktop and mobile and it synces instantly.
Compare that to Signal, you don't even sync between active devices and you can forget about having old conversations on a new device. And just to give you a scope of how important messaging history to people is (I've seen people say nobody cares about IM history) - designer from work is lugging around her Android phone year after switching to iPhone just for WhatsApp history (it doesn't sync between OS-es).
Re: Signal adds a payments feature with a privacy-focused cryptocurrency
#338The comment from the article echos my own sentiments: > Speaking solely as a person who is really into encrypted messaging, it terrifies me that they're going to take this really clean story of an encrypted messenger and mix it up with the nightmare of laws and regulations and vulnerability that is cryptocurrency. Moreover, there are three other points I'd add: 1. I don't like "do everything" apps like WeChat or Line…
> Early in Signal's development they would add privacy features. Lately they have been adding social features. This is intentional and relates to Signal's growth in the past few years. It's not "a hacker tool for nerds" it's "a friendly, easy to use chat app with stickers & voice messages (also strong encryption)." IRC does one thing and does it well, and barely anyone uses it. The "clean technical vision" story isn'…
Otherwise, agree with the thrust of your statement. I believe getting Signal into the hands of more users is an overall net good and if stickers are the answer then get to making some stickers.
Re: Signal adds a payments feature with a privacy-focused cryptocurrency
#339Re: Signal adds a payments feature with a privacy-focused cryptocurrency
#340Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just like how the US financial system only freezes the assets of Bad Guys, right? As for GME? We had to rugpull them because they were manipulating the market[1]. [1] Yes I know that wasn't the real reason why trading was halted
I don't know enough to comment on those things, I'm discussing the specific example of the ETH fork which was given.