Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll play the (intentional) Devil's Advocate here to present an alternative viewpoint. I like iOS, but not Android. Let me explain why. I personally love Linux, Unix philosophy (I'm even sometimes an old beardy zealot about POSIX standards and the old way ), and inherent customization possibilities. On the other hand, I don't want to manage my phone like a desktop or laptop computer, or a server because of a plethora…
>I like iOS, but not Android. Let me explain why. No Firefox on iOS, hence useless.
I want a computer that I own
331–340 of 668 posts
Re: I want a computer that I own
#332Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I like iOS, but not Android. Let me explain why. No Firefox on iOS, hence useless.
Then what have I been using on iOS for the past 4 years? (as long as I've been using iOS)
Re: I want a computer that I own
#333Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll play the (intentional) Devil's Advocate here to present an alternative viewpoint. I like iOS, but not Android. Let me explain why. I personally love Linux, Unix philosophy (I'm even sometimes an old beardy zealot about POSIX standards and the old way ), and inherent customization possibilities. On the other hand, I don't want to manage my phone like a desktop or laptop computer, or a server because of a plethora…
>I like iOS, but not Android. Let me explain why. No Firefox on iOS, hence useless.
Re: I want a computer that I own
#334Earlier quoted context omitted.
user-controlled / cheap / fast - pick 2. There's no way around economies of scale for consumer products.
Why can't Pine64 make $400 pinebook pros? I'd happily purchase a device that does something in 21st century standards.
Re: I want a computer that I own
#335Re: I want a computer that I own
#336Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll play the (intentional) Devil's Advocate here to present an alternative viewpoint. I like iOS, but not Android. Let me explain why. I personally love Linux, Unix philosophy (I'm even sometimes an old beardy zealot about POSIX standards and the old way ), and inherent customization possibilities. On the other hand, I don't want to manage my phone like a desktop or laptop computer, or a server because of a plethora…
> iOS takes all of these away. Complete backups are built-in (I know android has it, but I don't know how bulletproof is this) Not to burn you down, but to burn Android down: no, Android does not allow you to take complete backups. Let alone "built-in". The only backups that are made are forced to Google cloud and only backs-up apps that where downloaded through Google Play and app settings for Google stuff. It is an…
Can't you enable developer mode, open a terminal and just run `dd`?
Re: I want a computer that I own
#337I have a similar feeling, but with modern smartphones. Owning my computer is still relatively possible. I can build a computer from parts which I can choose, and have a choice in which operating system to install on them. Laptops are slightly more closed, but even on those I can choose the OS myself. Modern smartphones however, seem like walled gardens in which I have no control at all. I cannot choose any of the par…
I'll play the (intentional) Devil's Advocate here to present an alternative viewpoint. I like iOS, but not Android. Let me explain why. I personally love Linux, Unix philosophy (I'm even sometimes an old beardy zealot about POSIX standards and the old way ), and inherent customization possibilities. On the other hand, I don't want to manage my phone like a desktop or laptop computer, or a server because of a plethora…
Re: I want a computer that I own
#338It is interesting thought, especially as few days back someone in HN wrote completely opposite view, that everything should be controlled and spied on (and for the love of universe I cannot find it again, it was on first page of HN I would appreciate link ...), because with progress we are becoming more powerful and more destructive - so any human in future with enough knowledge, would have ability to destroying enti…
I take it as a given that a few generations from now, every move, expression, twitch, etc. will be recorded, persisted (in perpetuity), analyzed, etc. by many mutually hostile parties. Even right now, we're never far away from dozens of active microphones (i.e. phones) that may or may not be live streaming an audio feed over the network. Many cities are covered in cameras. A lot of financial traffic is electronic already. So, you could argue that although incomplete, it's already getting hard to cover your tracks. Tin foil hats don't really suffice anymore.
In fact, I believe we are just living through a very narrow window of time where this is all technically feasible but not common practice or practical yet on a global scale. I'm talking about a cradle to grave thing. It's not going to be opt in or opt out for anyone ultimately. It's basically an arms race.
However, I take some comfort from the notion that there will be many parties doing that and watching each other and thus keeping each other honest. The irony of that is that this applies equally to dictators, corrupt politicians, criminals, terrorists, military, etc. as well. They may be empowered to misbehave but they won't be able to do so covertly. If you are powerful enough, you get to rewrite history. But in the future that will require access to the digital archives of all your enemies. And you can never be sure that you got every bit of that.
Re: I want a computer that I own
#339Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I like iOS, but not Android. Let me explain why. No Firefox on iOS, hence useless.
For those that aren't aware: Because only safari is allowed in iOS every other browser is basically just a skin.
Of course, nowadays the assets of apps have to be part of the deployable, itself. So it's common to run localhost web server.
Re: I want a computer that I own
#340Earlier quoted context omitted.
HN is substantially larger than 4000 people, besides, telling people to design and fab their own chips is disingenuous. The right to privacy is not a 'first world problem', it is a problem.
It’s only a problem because people in general are not willing to pay for it. You and the OP have the same problem you want a solution but are not willing to pay the price. And you think that what you want is what most people want, but from what the market tells us they are pretty happy with what is being offered right now.
I don't think you can make statements about me with such a definitive tone without first asking some questions.