Live data from Hacker News

Mozilla Lifeboat

mozillalifeboat.com

331–336 of 336 posts

Re: Mozilla Lifeboat

#331

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried something like that. What happened was that the free time I had left was completely unproductive. Doing unfulfilling work is exhausting, turns out. Not saying I have all the answers, just what happened to me. This fulfilling thing is hard.

Billions of people go to work everyday without doing it out of “passion”.

Sure, we’re extremely privileged.

Re: Mozilla Lifeboat

#332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I were to work there it wouldn’t be so much to be an open source contributor but to be at the core of modern web. I don’t have kids so I don’t know what that part is like, though.

The modern web where less than 10% will use it? How is that “the core”? That’s like saying that working at Apple and being on the macOS team you will be part of the core of PC operating systems.

If you’re developing browsers which deal with modern standards you’re absolutely at the core of the web. Far more so than a typical web dev job.

But it seems that you just wanna piss on Firefox for market share reasons.

Re: Mozilla Lifeboat

#333
post #217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hmmm > Try this on a computer! This site is way more interactive on a bigger screen… so check it out next time you're on your desktop!

In Chrome: Menu > check "Desktop Site"

Stop using chrome. Use Firefox, https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/developer/.

Re: Mozilla Lifeboat

#335

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Folks, it's been like 3 weeks since we renamed Riot as Element, and (picking DDG) it's already the 18th hit from the top. Riot was 4th at the point we renamed it (second only to RG). Meanwhile it's already the top hit on the Play Store. So give it a few more weeks :) In terms of the name itself, I personally think "Let's talk on Element" is at least as catchy as "Let's talk on Riot", although it's touching to see fol…

Generally I like the new name a lot. The turning point that took me from lukewarm to positive was when the phrase, "in my element" popped into my head, which I think is a pretty fitting theme for a messenger app using a decentralized protocol like matrix ( almost (but not quite) enough for me to wish matrix were branded something like "bond" -- that which connects elements). However, there's one major way it's lackin…

Surely it’s just “message me”

Don’t try to make “matrix me” a thing, that’s the exact sort of thing that makes nerd decentralisation projects on the web fail outside of needing your own personal sysadmin to replace Twitter. It sounds dumb and matrix is known as a pain in the arse to use by people that have come across it, 1999 film otherwise

We have a word, it’s message.

Re: Mozilla Lifeboat

#336

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you under the impression that Facebook doesn't have privacy guidelines and strategies for its users just because its privacy goals don't align with yours? Just because they aren't the bastion of privacy doesn't mean they disregard privacy completely. Simple example: If I set my profile to be viewable by friends-only, that is a privacy feature. There are 800 more examples like that pertaining to protecting user da…

Facebook is the opposite of a privacy bastion. If you have such privacy features, it's only to stay relevant in the market and maintain some degree of trust so users continue to publish their data. Facebook do not care about privacy, they track people everywhere they can. They accumulate data and sell the knowledge they collected. Engineers who really care about privacy do not work for Facebook like engineers who rea…

That's great and all, but I was responding to your message that all the engineers focused on privacy at Facebook are just there for privacywashing. You don't seem to get that privacy is not a binary. I totally get that facebook "doesn't care about privacy" from the perspective of someone who actually cares a lot about privacy. But that's not the argument here, and it's strange for you to bring it up in your response. Nothing you've said actually supports the idea that Facebook doesn't need to have engineers who legitimately work on privacy.
Post reply on HN