Live data from Hacker News

Regional Air Mobility: Why we don’t plan to operate flights under 20km

lilium.com

331–334 of 334 posts

Re: Regional Air Mobility: Why we don’t plan to operate flights under 20km

#331
post #35

I would have thought any new transport technology would be heavily automated - from a brief look these require 1 pilot per 4 passengers. Not that it would be easy, I'm just surprised something so ambitious doesn't also include automation. At first glance I would have thought automating a small plane would be easier than automating a car - for one thing there are fewer things to crash into.

One word: compliance. FAA has lot of restrictions to allow a planes to fly with pilot in it. Imagine convincing them that without pilot.

Well this was good timing: https://www.businessinsider.com/airbus-completes-autonomous-...

Re: Regional Air Mobility: Why we don’t plan to operate flights under 20km

#332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you in the aviation industry? I am not. So know that what I'm saying is based on low-grade near-zero prior knowledge. Would love to know the certainty on your knowledge.

I think what matters more is the line of my argumentation. If I was a long-standing aviation industry veteran I would probably not be the source of great innovation and thus be blind for radical disruptions. Automotive and space disruptors had little to no prior knowledge but asked the right questions and had the right arguments... My line or argumentation does not require much aviation expertise: a heavily regulated…

Your arguments can be independently evaluated. Your claim to facts are questionable if they aren't from knowledge. I'll take it that you aren't in the industry and have priors similar to mine on your knowledge.

Thanks for the discussion.

Re: Regional Air Mobility: Why we don’t plan to operate flights under 20km

#333
post #284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would have to be onerous regulation. The cost difference between new and used is truly immense. A new Cessna 172 starts at around $400,000, and that's before you start checking off things on the options list. Used can be as low as $20,000 for examples for the 1960s. If you thought depreciation on luxury cars was bad... The GA system is already frankly dieing due to ever increasing costs. Your suggestion would ju…

I was working on my Private Pilot license in the mid-90's. I quit just around 40 hours with my only remaining required training maneuver being a Night cross country. I quit for pretty much the reasons you give: while I could have afforded to finish my license, I realized owning my own airplane would have been prohibitive. Sure, I could get a Cessna 152 for around $20k at the time, but then hangar fees, maintenance, i…

Are time shares not possible? Planes in this category are low utilization vehicles. The cost could be split between 3-4 or more owners.

Bottom line, between more pollution and making a hobby cheap , pollution should win every time.

Re: Regional Air Mobility: Why we don’t plan to operate flights under 20km

#334

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think what matters more is the line of my argumentation. If I was a long-standing aviation industry veteran I would probably not be the source of great innovation and thus be blind for radical disruptions. Automotive and space disruptors had little to no prior knowledge but asked the right questions and had the right arguments... My line or argumentation does not require much aviation expertise: a heavily regulated…

Your arguments can be independently evaluated. Your claim to facts are questionable if they aren't from knowledge. I'll take it that you aren't in the industry and have priors similar to mine on your knowledge. Thanks for the discussion.

I have been flying planes for 20 years. I own a plane. I worked for the largest commercial airline maintenance company in my country.
Post reply on HN