Live data from Hacker News

Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”

twitter.com

331–340 of 1001 posts

Re: Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”

#331
post #316

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is the POTUS clearly inciting violence or is it another instance of people having a wild interpretation of what he said? I'm so tired of this dynamic that I don't even bother anymore.

really? wild interpretation? it's a weird construction that's widely known to have been used by the police chief during similar circumstances? how big does the donkey have to be before you pin the tail on it? i wager there could be a video of trump composing the tweet with a biography of the police chief in view and open to the page with those words and you'd still claim to doubt the intent. it's exhausting having to…

Why isn't this tweet censored?

https://twitter.com/oliviagatwood/status/1266231558047846400

Re: Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”

#332
post #316

Once again! Bravo Jack and the Twitter team! Thank you taking a stand against bullying.

Is the POTUS clearly inciting violence or is it another instance of people having a wild interpretation of what he said? I'm so tired of this dynamic that I don't even bother anymore.

Judge for yourself, the exact tweet is:

> These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won’t let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!

Worth noting that this is a quote from former Miami Police Chief Walter Headley. In '67, he said the phrase "when the looting starts, the shooting starts" during racially charged protests.

Re: Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”

#333
Twitter is well within the rights to do this, but I have seen tweets from blue check marks essentially calling for violence and Twitter didn't remove them. So, does that mean Twitter actually -supports- those view points now? If Twitter is going to police people, it needs to be across the board. Otherwise it's just a weird censorship that is targeting one person and can easily be seen as political.

Everyone is applauding this because they hate Trump, but take a step back and see the bigger picture. This could backfire in serious ways, and it plays to Trump's base's narrative that the mainstream media and tech giants are colluding to silence conservatives (and maybe there could even be some truth to that.) I know the Valley is an echo chamber, so obviously no one is going to ever realize this.

Re: Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”

#334

One angle I don't see discussed: I wonder if Trump commits to more risky/bombastic/divisive plans as president because he feels confident that he can directly frame them and control the narrative by using his audience on Twitter, and he feels emboldened by how immediately Twitter is able to deliver the reactions. If there's a chance this is true, I can especially understand Twitter wanting to have no part in this. It…

Trump playbook: 1)cause problem 2)throw a fit, bluster, and lie to get his base riled up 3)gain minor concession from opponent and/or back down 5)claim victory

Re: Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”

#335
post #316

Once again! Bravo Jack and the Twitter team! Thank you taking a stand against bullying.

Is the POTUS clearly inciting violence or is it another instance of people having a wild interpretation of what he said? I'm so tired of this dynamic that I don't even bother anymore.

> Is the POTUS clearly inciting violence or is it another instance of people having a wild interpretation of what he said?

The POTUS unambiguously quoted racist Miami police chief Walter Headley who called for violence against African Americans during the civil rights movement of the 1960s. This couldn’t be a more clear example of inciting violence.

Re: Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”

#336
post #316

Once again! Bravo Jack and the Twitter team! Thank you taking a stand against bullying.

Is the POTUS clearly inciting violence or is it another instance of people having a wild interpretation of what he said? I'm so tired of this dynamic that I don't even bother anymore.

The guy who openly called for police to rough people up in the past does not get the benefit of the doubt here.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/28/donald-trump...

Re: Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”

#337

Twitter is well within the rights to do this, but I have seen tweets from blue check marks essentially calling for violence and Twitter didn't remove them. So, does that mean Twitter actually -supports- those view points now? If Twitter is going to police people, it needs to be across the board. Otherwise it's just a weird censorship that is targeting one person and can easily be seen as political. Everyone is applau…

Instead of being the police, Twitter should do what Rotten Tomatoes does. There are plenty of people - journalists and researchers analyzing the facts behind what celebrities say. They should analyze what the analysts say and display a score.

Re: Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”

#338
censoring the commander in chief is an active act of aggression against the american people. not only should we repeal section 230, we should view twitter as a hostile power.

we should study twitters deep ties to the saudis and china. and jack should be investigated. they also should no longer be protected by section 230 and therefore should be prosecuted for the child exploitation they host

Re: Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”

#339
post #16

The service that hosts the accounts of all branches of the US military, all major weapons contractors, all three letter agencies, and many foreign militaries, governments, and world leaders guilty of all manner of war crimes, and this is where they draw the line for violence. Really interesting.

Well, in political science and sociology, one of the most common definitions of the state is that it possesses a monopoly on legitimate/lawful violence. Violence conducted via the military or police, according to regulation , is lawful. But violence conducted by citizens, or by members of the government or military that is not according to law/regulation, is not lawful. I'm not saying Twitter's drawing the line exact…

Wasn't Trump referring to stand your ground laws?

Re: Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”

#340
post #16

The service that hosts the accounts of all branches of the US military, all major weapons contractors, all three letter agencies, and many foreign militaries, governments, and world leaders guilty of all manner of war crimes, and this is where they draw the line for violence. Really interesting.

Also don’t forget that Hamas has many official twitter accounts in various languages.

Have they posted suggestions of shooting their own citizens and not been sanctioned by Twitter?
Post reply on HN