A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store
331–340 of 614 posts
Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store
#332Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ad blocking on your first example, YouTube, is actually one of my favorite things about Firefox Mobile. Fuck watching half a minute of ads on YouTube before the thing I actually wanted.
Furthermore, if you're watching from within Firefox you can lock the screen without the video stopping.
Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store
#333time to bring out the anti-trust hammer and separate chrome and other google entities from the search and ad business. It really seems like they're asking for it.
Last year Google's net income was $30,740,000,000. Put another way, 30,740 millions. Obvious of course but all these zeroes often let us lose intuition of just how stupidly much money this is. There are a total of 535 voting members in the US congress. And of course to ensure a company is safe it needn't get all 535 members, just a handful of key players sprinkled about would be more than enough. I'm also certainly not suggesting this is some shady cloak and dagger nonsense as I initially proposed to you; instead, simply a result of completely legal lobbying. I come to you with a presumably poignant pretty pleasant palatable power-point presentation - the undertone of our exchange needs not even be spoken. I, as a mega corporation, am simply looking for politicians that are 'doing the right thing.' You could get a transcript of our conversation and it'd be perfectly kosher. Leave office and, even though we already regularly chat, if you've been a good boy you stand to get paid $400,000 for 30 minute chats, over and over. Got a loser son? You know I think he just has a lot of untapped potential. We're always looking for executive advisors that can offer unique perspectives - pay's about half a million per year.
I find it difficult to find any other explanation for the state of business today. The behaviors of companies today are vastly more anticompetitive than those of companies in times past, an increasingly distant past, when the government actually did anything. The difference seems to be that modern companies have just become vastly larger, and they're increasingly interweaving with government. I wonder if this is analogous to how people felt in the days before the separation of church and state.
Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store
#334It's time to switch to Firefox as my main web browser. It's faster and generally more efficient than Chrome plus it has the most important extensions. The most surprising thing is that the Android version of Firefox is excellent. So good that I switched from Chrome a few months ago when this expected news first dropped. No ads on mobile is awesome.
I used Firefox before Chrome and have tried to swap numerous times in the past (and have been using it for the last few weeks). Advocates for Firefox often say "Firefox is better, just try switching!" yet when people point out reasons it's not better the response is "Oh those don't matter, you're just being nitpicky!" But it's not a very gentle push back, it's forceful. In this thread someone says "I don't like how m…
Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store
#335Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store
#336Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store
#337time to bring out the anti-trust hammer and separate chrome and other google entities from the search and ad business. It really seems like they're asking for it.
I don't understand. Out of every company in tech, Google has made my life fantastic. I don't understand the Google hate, I don't know where it comes from. People don't like getting relevant advertising, but they do like when Apple closes off their App store 'for safety'. I don't know why the double standard. I personally think this is a massive advertising campaign from one of the FAANG companies and we are the tools…
I don't practise any double standard here either. Same goes for apple. If they use their app store to stop competition by for example Spotify to promote apple music, break that up as well. The same thing for amazon, if they use AWS money to price dump on eCommerce or disadvantage third-party sellers, break it up.
I don't have any favourites here, whenever one of these companies engages in activity that is clearly bad for the ecosystem just for their own benefit I would like to see a very rapid and proactive response.
Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store
#338It's time to switch to Firefox as my main web browser. It's faster and generally more efficient than Chrome plus it has the most important extensions. The most surprising thing is that the Android version of Firefox is excellent. So good that I switched from Chrome a few months ago when this expected news first dropped. No ads on mobile is awesome.
Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store
#339Earlier quoted context omitted.
what was painful?
Having switched to Firefox three months ago, the three things that I miss most are, 1. The integration with Google Translate, which I understand would be difficult for Firefox to replicate 2. The ability to right-click on an image to search by image, which is probably similarly difficult to add to Firefox. [Edit: Thanks, vatueil, I will give that a try.] 3. How Chrome is less picky about what text it identifies as a…
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/imtranslator/
Especially the inline translation feature is very handy if you are learning a foreign language and want to see the texts side by side.
Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store
#340I love my Pi-hole. Best thing since sliced bread. Google will have a hard time outmanoeuvring that one.