Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah well back then we had actual opponents. North Korea are crackpots, and some fundamentalists prefer living with goats in caves to comfortable air travel, but never in a million years will those cranks be the threat that the Axis or even the Soviets were.
Do you believe that China isn't a worthy enough competitor in electronic espionage? Or the occasionally conflicting interests with Russia and other countries? The main job of NSA isn't to support short-term military operations in whatever location they're fighting today, they have to ensure that if they suddenly need to focus on country X, then they already have years/decades worth of collected intelligence.
The NSA: An Inside View
321–323 of 323 posts
Re: The NSA: An Inside View
#322I spent four years in (2 years longer than the OP), but worked on a substantially broader swath of intelligence areas and in much more policy-oriented positions, and I can tell you that the vitriol that's been displayed on HackerNews is incredibly tiresome to see, because you are all missing a very key point about how the NSA conducts business (which I've pointed out in previous posts). The key point is this: the NSA…
Mr. Policy: I would like to learn more about Citizen A, but Mr. NSA is strongly prohibited from accessing data specific to citizens of this country. Unlike many rules this prohibition actually is taken seriously, with major consequences for anyone caught violating it.
Mr. GCHQ: Bob's your uncle. Would you like that in .zip or .tar format?
Re: The NSA: An Inside View
#323Right, Loren, so: * even though Congress was lied to/mislead about the scope of the NSA's programs, by none other than the Director of National Intelligence [1] * despite the fact that the NSA hastily rushed to justify an invasion of Syria with misleading data [2] * despite the fact that the NSA helped produce evidence to justify the false invasion of Iraq [3] * despite the fact that the NSA helps to subvert crypto s…
I won't even do that. I've read enough history to understand that losing a few planes and buildings once in a while is no big deal compared to what eventually happens to a country governed by the ethos exposed in the Snowden documents.
The ends do not justify the means.