Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.3

docs.x.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

321–330 of 608 posts

Re: Grok 4.3

#321

Post by aprilthird2021 »

everfrustrated wrote: post #154
drivingmenuts wrote: post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I look at the person behind it all, I have to wonder how the hell people can even consider using grok? Or using Twitter? Or any of that. Using any of those things puts money in Musk's pockets and further enables and encourages him to continue being a Neo-Nazi wannabe. Do they think it's just a phase?

Do you drive BMW or VW car? Boy do I have news for you!

The current heads of BMW are not present day crazy Nazis or at the most charitable interpretation: fueling the far right around the world

Re: Grok 4.3

#324

Post by embedding-shape »

2ndorderthought wrote: post #293
embedding-shape wrote: post #212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Please don't validate any of this personally that would be illegal. Obviously, I assumed we all are familiar with our local laws to not unwittingly commit crimes here :) > I think the proportion of people generating images that way is likely very low So probably a far cry from "holding the world record for the biggest generator of CSAM" given the amount of local alternatives available? Would be my guess at least, b…

I have no idea what people are doing to get it to generate illegal content. I only know there are thousands of cases of it via articles about it. I have not, and will not use grok as a product.

> I have no idea what people are doing to get it to generate illegal content.

Isn't that relevant to somehow know those things before you say stuff like "I am sure it is possible"? Seems bit strange to first confidently claim you know something then saying you actually have no idea.

Not doubting that it used to be true, that people could generate CSAM, I just don't see how it's possible today, because it seems heavily censored for any explicit/adult content.

Re: Grok 4.3

#325

Post by Zancarius »

GTP wrote: post #247
cowsup wrote: post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think Twitter/X know for sure who the bots are, since Elon has been pretty vocal about trying to stop them for ages, yet I still get lots of spam DMs (as do others with far fewer followers/reach). Even if 95% of the spam gets actively reported and dealt with, that still leaves a ton of nonsense on the platform, getting fed into the LLM. And spam has only gotten worse over the years, as the barrier to entry ha…

Are the spam DMs advertisements or more generally something linked to a product or service? I wouldn't be surprised if X is more lenient towards bots that pay them for adverts.

Most of what I get seem to be advertisements or automated messages if you follow large(r) accounts.

One of the most interesting things that I've noticed is these advertisements will be triggered if you follow accounts that are positioned as influencers. I followed one out of curiosity and received a DM from that account advertising some cryptocurrency service.

It's a good way to filter out and block accounts that have almost certainly not grown organically.

Re: Grok 4.3

#326

Post by brazukadev »

amunozo wrote: post #274

It's Google time to release something. If I'm not mistaken, it's the big lab that did not release a big model in the last month.

Google released Gemma4 recently and got quite good reviews from the local models community.

Re: Grok 4.3

#328

Post by vrganj »

gadders wrote: post #296
vrganj wrote: post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You think Lenin was into gender issues? You think Lenin wasn't a leftist?

You think Lenin is alive now? Name a gender-critical left wing party.

Perú Libre.

Your turn. Name a leftist party that's obsessed with identity politics.

Re: Grok 4.3

#329

Post by thinkingtoilet »

gordian-mind wrote: post #297
thinkingtoilet wrote: post #267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

[flagged]

What is pathetic is saying "we shouldn't care about killing poor people". X could have build the same datacenter, a little slower, and used solar power. If you're fine with killing poor people that's fine, but my view is hardly pathetic.

Re: Grok 4.3

#330

Post by jerf »

randallsquared wrote: post #162
draxil wrote: post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't like that word, which was previously a common part of my vocabulary, being forever ruined?

My father's name was Claude, but, you know. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

We need to get these companies to predeclare what names they're going to use for the next 50 or 60 years so we can avoid them.

Pouring one out for all the "Alexa"s in the world.

Post reply on HN