Harold and George Destroy the World

Post by c22 » Fri, Mar 20, 2026, 11:13 AM UTC

SideburnsOfDoom wrote: post #320

c22 wrote: post #317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Citations: https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/the-world-has-passe... https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/life/2022/11/12/the-stats-guy...

Ah, the "the "Everyone is Twelve now" theory of politics" doesn't mean literal young children. It refers to the mentality of the (often gerontocratic) leaders and their adult supporters. Infantilism, not infants.

I understand, of course, and was being mostly tongue in cheek. However, I do think there could be something to the idea that as the majority of the world has trended younger we notice a net decrease in perceived maturity across the population.

Post by SideburnsOfDoom » Fri, Mar 20, 2026, 11:43 AM UTC

c22 wrote: post #321

SideburnsOfDoom wrote: post #320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah, the "the "Everyone is Twelve now" theory of politics" doesn't mean literal young children. It refers to the mentality of the (often gerontocratic) leaders and their adult supporters. Infantilism, not infants.

I understand, of course, and was being mostly tongue in cheek. However, I do think there could be something to the idea that as the majority of the world has trended younger we notice a net decrease in perceived maturity across the population.

In addition, "worldwide" is misleading - the countries where the "Everyone is Twelve now" theory of politics is most evident are not the same countries where the population has recently trended younger.

It would make more sense (not much more, but more) to blame early life lead exposure in the generation currently at the top of the political pile. Or blame social media.

Re: Harold and George Destroy the World

Re: Harold and George Destroy the World