Earlier quoted context omitted.
One aspect of this is that apparently most people can't draw a bicycle much better than this: they get the elements of the frame wrong, mess up the geometry, etc.
Yes, but obviously AGI will solve this by, _checks notes_ more TerraWatts!
Claude Opus 4.6
321–330 of 1001 posts
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#322The bicycle frame is a bit wonky but the pelican itself is great: https://gist.github.com/simonw/a6806ce41b4c721e240a4548ecdbe...
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#323Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#324Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just for fun? Not everything has to be super serious… have a laugh, go for a walk, relax…
Mass-mass-mass-mass good comment. I mean. No I’m having an error - probably claud
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#325I'm disappointed that they're removing the prefill option: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/models/what... > Prefilling assistant messages (last-assistant-turn prefills) is not supported on Opus 4.6. Requests with prefilled assistant messages return a 400 error. That was a really cool feature of the Claude API where you could force it to begin its response with e.g. ` They suggest structured outputs o…
So what exactly is the input to Claude for a multi-turn conversation? I assume delimiters are being added to distinguish the user vs Claude turns (else a prefill would be the same as just ending your input with the prefill text)?
No one (approximately) outside of Anthropic knows since the chat template is applied on the API backend; we only known the shape of the API request. You can get a rough idea of what it might be like from the chat templates published for various open models, but the actual details are opaque.
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#326Can we talk about how the performance of Opus 4.5 nosedived this morning during the rollout? It was shocking how bad it was, and after the rollout was done it immediately reverted to it's previous behavior. I get that Anthropic probably has to do hot rollouts, but IMO it would be way better for mission critical workflows to just be locked out of the system instead of get a vastly subpar response back.
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#327Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#328Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not just that. Everyone is complacent with the utilization of AI agents. I have been using AI for coding for quite a while, and most of my "wasted" time is correcting its trajectory and guiding it through the thinking process. It's very fast iterations but it can easily go off track. Claude's family are pretty good at doing chained task, but still once the task becomes too big context wise, it's impossible to ge…
Cost wise, doesn’t that depend on what you could be doing besides steering agents?
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#329Claude Code release notes: > Version 2.1.32: • Claude Opus 4.6 is now available! • Added research preview agent teams feature for multi-agent collaboration (token-intensive feature, requires setting CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1) • Claude now automatically records and recalls memories as it works • Added "Summarize from here" to the message selector, allowing partial conversation summarization. • Skills defi…
> Claude now automatically records and recalls memories as it works Neat: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/memory I guess it's kind of like Google Antigravity's "Knowledge" artifacts?
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#330This is the first model to which I send my collection of nearly 900 poems and an extremely simple prompt (in Portuguese), and it manages to produce an impeccable analysis of the poems, as a (barely) cohesive whole, which span 15 years. It does not make a single mistake, it identifies neologisms, hidden meaning, 7 distinct poetic phases, recurring themes, fragments/heteronyms, related authors. It has left me completel…
This sounds wayyyy over the top for a mode that released 10 mins ago. At least wait an hour or so before spewing breathless hype.