This isn’t really about Greenland’s strategic value; it’s about the category error. You can trade goods, sign treaties, and negotiate basing rights. You can’t “buy” a people or their sovereignty especially when they don’t consent. That’s why Europe responds with process and principle: normalize coercion-as-bargaining among allies and you’re reviving a pre-1945 model of politics Europe built institutions to prevent. I…
The US has some grace here as most of the negative feelings towards it dies with it's government. You're going to pick better next time, right?
Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands,Norway,Sweden,UK
321–330 of 604 posts
Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands,Norway,Sweden,UK
#322This isn’t really about Greenland’s strategic value; it’s about the category error. You can trade goods, sign treaties, and negotiate basing rights. You can’t “buy” a people or their sovereignty especially when they don’t consent. That’s why Europe responds with process and principle: normalize coercion-as-bargaining among allies and you’re reviving a pre-1945 model of politics Europe built institutions to prevent. I…
The US has some grace here as most of the negative feelings towards it dies with it's government. You're going to pick better next time, right?
Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands,Norway,Sweden,UK
#323Earlier quoted context omitted.
The linked article says the US has threatened to reduce its support, not committed to leave. Things are bad enough without exaggerating like this.
Functionally, us not participating in defense coordination mechanisms is the equivalent of leaving NATO, as we would not be able to unify response.
Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands,Norway,Sweden,UK
#324Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands,Norway,Sweden,UK
#325Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands,Norway,Sweden,UK
#326Earlier quoted context omitted.
That would be a horrible deal for the Greenlanders, and they know it - there were polls recently and Vance was pretty much told that when he visited there. The US is allowed for decades to have a military presence on Greenland, but the US Army has been diminishing it's presence as the time went by.
Up it to $5 million per Greenlander then. The US can afford to pull the trigger on a $250-$280 billion acquisition. The EU can't afford to counter it. To put that sum into perspective for the US economy: that's merely 2.x years of operating income for Google. There's no scenario where the people of Greenland reject that $250b offer in a free vote.
Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands,Norway,Sweden,UK
#327I wonder how the current events in Greenland will impact the safety and sovereignty of Taiwan. The US is Taiwan’s most important military ally, even if that relationship remains unofficial. It is also the most critical power in the First Island Chain. If the US stopped being a global superpower, countries like Japan and South Korea might not be willing to aid in defending Taiwan on their own.
Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands,Norway,Sweden,UK
#328Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not just a dictionary definition, there's a real threshold for what can be considered psychopathy in clinical terms. You could say that about a lot of people you don't like. I'm not saying there's some traits, but we could say that about many people. He's narcissistic for sure and charismatic, but again... If you want something more likely, look up NPD: Key Characteristics Grandiosity: Exaggerated sense of self-…
Ok, fair enough, thanks. I can roll with that. But in summary: we have a problem.
I can see he's also being increasingly influenced by his circle like Miller, also for the fact that unlike in 2017, there was no huge line of people coming to the administration, but after his first term now we have all these guys orbiting him trying to use him as a vehicle to push their policy.
And it seems to be fairly easy, just stoke him a bit saying "they don't want you to do this because they think you're weak!!"
And you can see it with the whole excessive gifting by foreign leaders. It works. Myself I'd be insulted because it feels so fake, but he seems to be unaware.
The guy's ego has blown up like crazy this past decade.
Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands,Norway,Sweden,UK
#329Even all of the purely imperialistic stated reasons for taking Greenland make no sense. National security? We already have the right to station as many troops there as we want! And we have actually removed troops recently. Mineral rights? America is already richly endowed - its just impossible to access what we have when permitting is almost impossible. If there were actually valuable lodes in Greenland, it would pro…
Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands,Norway,Sweden,UK
#330I think the administration's real goal isn't taking over Greenland. I think it's scaring the EU enough about the possibility the US might take over Greenland that the EU pays to fortify it so the US doesn't have to. (Somebody needs to fortify it, because the world is warming and it will become a strategically important trade choke point when a Northwest Passage opens up.) Just like Trump being hot-and-cold on Ukraine…
The simplest explanation is usually the correct one.