Live data from Hacker News

Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams

missionlocal.org

321–330 of 468 posts

Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams

#321

How did FSD Teslas do at the traffic signals? Or Nuro?

Here's an example of it doing well: https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2002699317409186219

The Tesla example is a single oncoming car, clear right of way, and ample time in a simple 4-way intersection.

The Waymo video has over a dozen cars, at least 6 pedestrians crossing streets (many more on the sidewalks), and is a 5-way intersection.

These are cherry picked examples. Either advertising or propaganda.

Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams

#322
post #234
post #93

From John Ripley on Mastodon: “Thought of the day, and I wish there were a way to get this to legislators: Come the next Big One earthquake, all of San Francisco’s emergency services will be blocked by Waymos.” I’m AMAZED they’re not designed to handle this better. This does indeed seem like a massive problem. “Oops we give up” right when things get the worst? How is this OK? I’ve been very impressed by Waymo’s more…

Waymo may discover that heavy equipment (large fire trucks can easily push Waymo out of the way if it can find somewhere to push it to) WILL move the cars (at least if there is no one in them at the time) in such cases. I recall the scenes during recent wildfires where abandoned cars were blocking roads and a skip loader was just picking up the cars and dumping/pushing them to the side of the road/over the edge - cau…

There are people in the Waymos. It's like not moving parked cars.

Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fire trucks are very expensive to be playing bumper cars with

if google's property is blocking the road, google can pay for the damage

That doesn't bring people back to life or restore quality of life for life-changing injuries.

Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams

#324
post #322
post #234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Waymo may discover that heavy equipment (large fire trucks can easily push Waymo out of the way if it can find somewhere to push it to) WILL move the cars (at least if there is no one in them at the time) in such cases. I recall the scenes during recent wildfires where abandoned cars were blocking roads and a skip loader was just picking up the cars and dumping/pushing them to the side of the road/over the edge - cau…

There are people in the Waymos. It's like not moving parked cars.

The jaws of life can make quick work of any locked doors before continuing to bulldoze a car out of the way.

Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams

#325
post #93

From John Ripley on Mastodon: “Thought of the day, and I wish there were a way to get this to legislators: Come the next Big One earthquake, all of San Francisco’s emergency services will be blocked by Waymos.” I’m AMAZED they’re not designed to handle this better. This does indeed seem like a massive problem. “Oops we give up” right when things get the worst? How is this OK? I’ve been very impressed by Waymo’s more…

In cases where the traffic signal is not working, it is known that the FSD has to take on a more challenging role of reading traffic agent gestures. I think they have that functionality built in. But not when neither traffic signal is working nor traffic agent is present.

The basic thing is to treat everything like a four-way stop sign.

Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams

#326
post #93

From John Ripley on Mastodon: “Thought of the day, and I wish there were a way to get this to legislators: Come the next Big One earthquake, all of San Francisco’s emergency services will be blocked by Waymos.” I’m AMAZED they’re not designed to handle this better. This does indeed seem like a massive problem. “Oops we give up” right when things get the worst? How is this OK? I’ve been very impressed by Waymo’s more…

>I’m AMAZED they’re not designed to handle this better.

This has been the MO for "tech companies" for the past 20 years. Meanwhile I'm told I'm paranoid when the industry of "move fast or break things" decides to move into mission/safety critical industries and use its massive wealth to lobby for deregulation to maintain its habits.

We certainly have BS regulations done to constrain competition. But I'd wager a good 80% of them exist for good reason.

Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams

#327
post #268

I was driving across the east side of SF and hit a patch of lights that were out. The Waymo's were just going really slow through the intersection. It seemed that the "light is out means 4-way stop" dynamic caused them to go into ultra-timid mode. And of course the human drivers did the typical slow and roll, with decent interleaving. The result was that each Waymo took about 4x as long to get through the intersectio…

Failed pretty badly but no reported injuries or even accidents so not that badly. And if you’re Waymo, it’s a short-term reputation hit but great experience to learn from and improve.

>to learn from and improve.

Okay, let's see if they actually do it this time.

Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams

#328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m curious what’s the regulation in this scenario? In Canada I think light off means 4-way stop signs so everyone obeys that, or at least most of everyone. What’s the situation in SF?

Yes, that is the same law in California, but so many people drift through stop signs that the guidance is close to meaningless. In addition, there are 4-way stop signs all over SF and tourists regularly comment on how they work here. The law is clear - yield to the right, but that is a pretty slow system in congested roads. The local custom in SF is that someone is usually obviously first, rightmost, or just most agg…

Thanks, I get the situation is pretty chaos...

Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams

#329
post #283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m curious what’s the regulation in this scenario? In Canada I think light off means 4-way stop signs so everyone obeys that, or at least most of everyone. What’s the situation in SF?

Legally in the United States a completely dead traffic signal becomes an all way stop.

Thanks you!

Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams

#330

In my experience, humans respond incredibly poorly to traffic lights being out. There's no sense or reason, just people deciding to drive across the intersection when they feel like it's okay. Presumably Waymo will make sure they can handle this situation in the future, but I'm not sure there's a really satisfactory solution. The way you're supposed to handle an intersection with no lights (treat it as a stop sign in…

That wasn’t my experience, having just driven across the city and back during tonight’s outage. It was actually weirdly inspiring how well people coordinated at so many of the powerless intersections. There was a lot of confusion, and some people took advantage of it to rush through, but for the most part it was pretty orderly. Which makes sense because in many parts of the world where there are no traffic lights or…

The general wisdom is to treat a broken light like a stop sign. So it really comes down to how well that wisdom is absorbed when the time comes.

Herd mentality also helps here. We see the first few people do this and we will follow along pretty quickly.

Post reply on HN