Live data from Hacker News

GPT-5

openai.com

321–330 of 1001 posts

Re: GPT-5

#321

Short anything that’s riding on AGI coming soon. This presentation has gotten rid of all my fears of my children growing up in a crazy winner take all AGI world.

Don't count your chickens before they hatch. I believe that the odds of an architecture substantially better than autoregressive causal GPTs coming out of the woodwork within the next year is quite high.

Re: GPT-5

#323

Going by the system card at: https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-system-card/ > GPT‑5 is a unified system . . . OK > . . . with a smart and fast model that answers most questions, a deeper reasoning model for harder problems, and a real-time router that quickly decides which model to use based on conversation type, complexity, tool needs, and explicit intent (for example, if you say “think hard about this” in the prompt).…

Many tiny, specialized models is the way to go, and if that's what they're doing then it's a good thing.

We already did this for Object/Face recognition, it works but it's not the way to go. It's the way to go only if you don't have enough compute power (and data, I suspect) for a E2E network

Re: GPT-5

#324

Going by the system card at: https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-system-card/ > GPT‑5 is a unified system . . . OK > . . . with a smart and fast model that answers most questions, a deeper reasoning model for harder problems, and a real-time router that quickly decides which model to use based on conversation type, complexity, tool needs, and explicit intent (for example, if you say “think hard about this” in the prompt).…

It's a concept of a unified system.

Re: GPT-5

#325

What's going on with this plot's y-axis? https://bsky.app/profile/tylermw.com/post/3lvtac5hues2n

[flagged]

Please don't post like this to Hacker News, regardless of how idiotic other people are or you feel they are.

You may not owe people who you feel are idiots better, but you owe this community better if you're participating in it.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: GPT-5

#326

ChatGPT5 in this demo: > For an airplane wing (airfoil), the top surface is curved and the bottom is flatter. When the wing moves forward: > * Air over the top has to travel farther in the same amount of time -> it moves faster -> pressure on the top decreases. > * Air underneath moves slower -> pressure underneath is higher > * The presure difference creates an upward force - lift Isn't that explanation of why wings…

Sam will fix this in the next release he just needs you to give him more money

Re: GPT-5

#327

GPT-5 was supposed to make choosing models and reasoning efforts simpler. I think they made it more complex. > GPT‑5’s reasoning_effort parameter can now take a minimal value to get answers back faster, without extensive reasoning first. > While GPT‑5 in ChatGPT is a system of reasoning, non-reasoning, and router models, GPT‑5 in the API platform is the reasoning model that powers maximum performance in ChatGPT. Nota…

reasoning effort is Gemini's thinking budget from 6 months ago

Re: GPT-5

#328

ChatGPT5 in this demo: > For an airplane wing (airfoil), the top surface is curved and the bottom is flatter. When the wing moves forward: > * Air over the top has to travel farther in the same amount of time -> it moves faster -> pressure on the top decreases. > * Air underneath moves slower -> pressure underneath is higher > * The presure difference creates an upward force - lift Isn't that explanation of why wings…

[deleted]

Re: GPT-5

#330

Damn, you guys are toxic. So -- they did not invent AGI yet. Yet, I like what I'm seeing. Major progress on multiple fronts. Hallucination fix is exciting on its own. The React demos were mindblowing.

Do you prefer the non-stop AI spam that is typical on this site instead?
Post reply on HN