Live data from Hacker News

Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

twitter.com

321–330 of 433 posts

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#321
It's not just images. I frequently get genAI word salad in the top three to five results when I google anything that could be considered a common question. You don't even realize at first when you start reading. Then it makes you start to question the things that aren't obviously genAI. You can sort of tell the kinds of things that a human might be wrong about, the ways in which they're wrong, how they sound when they're wrong, how likely they are to be wrong, the formats and platforms wrongness exists within, how often they are wrong and how other humans respond to that. AI is a different beast. No intuition or experience can tell you when reasonable-sounding AI is wrong.

Our entire framework of unconscious heuristics for ranking the quality of communicated information being rendered useless overnight may be a recipe for insanity and misery. Virtually nothing has made me this genuinely sad about technology in all my life.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#322
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kagi is not a panacea unfortunately. I pay for it and daily drive it to support a Google alternative, but I still have real trouble with my results being full of AI garbage (both image and text search). As mentioned, product comparisons are a big one but another worrying area is anything medical related. I was trying to find research about a medicine I'm taking this week and the already SEO infested results of 5 year…

I use Kagi personally every day and my results are definitely not full of AI garbage so would like to better understand your context. Have you reported any of those issues to Kagi (support/discord/user forum)? We are pretty good at dealing with search quality issues.

Vladimir, when posting things like this, you might want to disclose that you're Kagi's CEO.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#326

Spam (created by humans) evolves. So do humans. If Google prioritizes AI slop, Google will be deprioritized.

I really don't think that's the case. The lesson of the 2020s internet is that the biggest players have become too big to be disrupted.

The masses are fully here now. They're too passive to know or care what's going on. They stick with the path of least resistance: Google, Amazon, Reddit, Twitter, etc. No matter how hostile or shitty those options become.

We have to put aside the way we've thought about the internet before now because it doesn't apply anymore. There will be no more MySpace -> Facebook. The internet is no longer made up of a high enough percentage of conscientious and deliberate users to make a difference.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#327

It's not just images. I frequently get genAI word salad in the top three to five results when I google anything that could be considered a common question. You don't even realize at first when you start reading. Then it makes you start to question the things that aren't obviously genAI. You can sort of tell the kinds of things that a human might be wrong about, the ways in which they're wrong, how they sound when the…

Not to steal your thunder but loss of privacy still makes me much sadder

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#329
All AI image and video generators must be forced to add metadata and watermarks and all uploading technology (browsers, iphone & Android SDKs, etc and websites, apps, etc) need to publish/label AI Generated or not. Then search engines worth their salt can filter out the AI crap and boom we are back to how the Internet was or if you want to see the fake crap change the filter.
Post reply on HN