Live data from Hacker News

Starlink offering free internet access for 30 days for Hurricane Helene victims

starlink.com

321–330 of 374 posts

Re: Starlink offering free internet access for 30 days for Hurricane Helene victims

#321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not accepting claims is different from anti elon bias. You say X is good or bad, my response is prove it. You say X is meaningful, I have the same response. That is not being upset, it is being skeptical. With that said, I now concede there is more than marginal utility happening and I've done the numbers in sibling comments. The fact I've evolved my opinion based on further information I think makes most of your scr…

"You say X is good or bad, my response is provd it. You say X is meaningful, I have the same response." - No I didn't. Your bias is showing again. "Are you referring to FEMA? Since there is at least one cajun navy style person who requested this that I am aware of, I would largely agree." No - I am referring to the on the ground actual FIRST responders who were there helping immediately (and continue to volunteer the…

Wow.. what did I fake quote? What claims were unsupported?

My question to you whether you were talking about FEMA or civilians was a QUESTION!! It was not a logical trap. I wanted to understand what you were saying better. That you ranted about it, put words into my mouth - does not bode well. It was a clarifying question. I don't need you feeling anything about me just as much as you don't need correcting. I do think you are reading way more into what I'm writing, and are conflating the lack of accepting your claims with making those of my own. If you can clarify, it would be helpful. Otherwise calm down since the personal attacks are not in the spirit of this discussion board.

Re: Starlink offering free internet access for 30 days for Hurricane Helene victims

#322

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Blame Congress. (1) they control budget and can add the additional funds. They also know that half a billion is being "diverted" from acute disaster relief. The budgeting is on them. (2) Congress needsto amend the asylum law to allow asylum claims at ports of entry or not at all. That congress has a law disallowing asylum claims at ports of entry is why people are crossing deserts and then surrendering to the first a…

There is plenty of blame to go around, and Congress is certainly at the top of that list. It's a pretty long list though. Zero sum or not, the attitude you have about budget discussions is why we are about to print ourselves into a depression. If you can't discuss prioritizing spending based on whatever criteria applies to the situation, you simply can't discuss budget concerns. I do not take the view that the budget…

> I do not take the view that the budget our taxes pay for is beyond reproach

Sure, and I have a similar view. Show me what we bought for $640M instead of just saying we spent $640M. How many people did we house for that? How many people weren't living on the streets because of it? What kind of conditions were they in? How many nights did we cover? What was average spent per person per night? Is that a reasonable cost? Just complaining about $640M answers none of these things.

You've got an overly simplistic view of government spending if just looking at a dollar amount (which is peanuts in terms of the overall spending of even this one agency) is enough for you to get upset about it.

We're going to need many, many billions from FEMA for this, which comes from a separate budget entirely. If this disaster costs FEMA $50B in relief (probably a way too low estimate), that migrant cost is only 1.3% of the total outlays of just this one storm. But FEMA has already spent over $20B on disaster relief this year so if this storm does end up costing $50B that's really $70B in disaster relief alone along with the several billion in other spending FEMA usually has. So really more like 640M / 75B == Arguing that $640M spent on migrant housing efforts is somehow massively impacting FEMA's responses to disasters is just ignoring reality. Its less than 1% of the money FEMA has to spend. Argue you don't think the migrants deserved the housing, but don't act like FEMA's response would have been materially different to any disaster if that money hadn't been spent. Because that's not based in reality at all.

And if you're upset about FEMA's allegedly poor responses to other disasters (not personally claiming either way here to any specific response), what makes you think just throwing more money at those responses would have solved whatever problems were there? I thought we were wanting to argue for the government to give us more bang for our buck not just throw more money at problems without going into deeper analysis of supposed failures. Maybe those issues were underbudgeting, maybe they were management issues, maybe they were issues outside of FEMA entirely.

Having a really big focus on Any amount of government waste is worth talking about to me. But just throwing out an amount and saying it was spent on migrants isn't telling me its waste. Pointing out that half that was spent at a Ritz-Carlton for a dozen migrants would be, but that's probably not the reality of the spend.

Re: Starlink offering free internet access for 30 days for Hurricane Helene victims

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Or put another way Musk is anti censorship, anti war in Ukraine, anti complying with the Harris/Biden agenda to deplatform political rivals such as they did 4 days after Biden took office, forcing Pre Musk Twitter/X and Facebook to do their bidding - or else. Turns out the ones squawking loudest about the other being a threat to democracy are in fact the ones actively working against our Constitutional Rights. And I’…

I can't agree more, I'm a black lifelong Democrat and I'm fed up with their lies. Nowadays I only get my information from Truth Social and I finally realized how evil Democrats are.

Re: Starlink offering free internet access for 30 days for Hurricane Helene victims

#324

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not accepting claims is different from anti elon bias. You say X is good or bad, my response is prove it. You say X is meaningful, I have the same response. That is not being upset, it is being skeptical. With that said, I now concede there is more than marginal utility happening and I've done the numbers in sibling comments. The fact I've evolved my opinion based on further information I think makes most of your scr…

"You say X is good or bad, my response is provd it. You say X is meaningful, I have the same response." - No I didn't. Your bias is showing again. "Are you referring to FEMA? Since there is at least one cajun navy style person who requested this that I am aware of, I would largely agree." No - I am referring to the on the ground actual FIRST responders who were there helping immediately (and continue to volunteer the…

> "Every claim?" Yep

I was curious about this and triple checked. Some claims had citations. Therefore at least some were supported.

I wrote:

> Somewhat helping a couple hundred people out of a million plus, is not quite the "nice" gesture.

I understand a bit more the disconnect now. I did not write carefully that I meant that as a hypothetical, in the context of an "at worst." As a claim, I would agree it is unsupported. And I agree it can reasonably read that way. I can see how that would bias the reading of the rest of the content.

> that dude that bought 50 StarLinks on his own credit card and hauled them out to those in need

Is that a real example? I'm willing to take your word for it. I don't read twitter nor reddit. Those types of anecdotes are not reported on from the sources I read.

Which is to say, you genuinely have some info I don't have. No logical traps. I am learning more about the scale and utility of starlink. Anecdotes do not make data, at the same time I appreciate the info. I do wish you could unbias the conversation, make it about ideas and data, and not make this personal.

Re: Starlink offering free internet access for 30 days for Hurricane Helene victims

#325

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"You say X is good or bad, my response is provd it. You say X is meaningful, I have the same response." - No I didn't. Your bias is showing again. "Are you referring to FEMA? Since there is at least one cajun navy style person who requested this that I am aware of, I would largely agree." No - I am referring to the on the ground actual FIRST responders who were there helping immediately (and continue to volunteer the…

Wow.. what did I fake quote? What claims were unsupported? My question to you whether you were talking about FEMA or civilians was a QUESTION!! It was not a logical trap. I wanted to understand what you were saying better. That you ranted about it, put words into my mouth - does not bode well. It was a clarifying question. I don't need you feeling anything about me just as much as you don't need correcting. I do thin…

This is the last thing I am going to say to you, after twice now I have told you I am done with this conversation. There is absolutely nothing further to discuss between us, but I want to make this point abundantly clear for anyone who is clicking 'expand' on all of your downvoted comments:

"Is that a real example?" Yes. It was one of the people who were specifically asking that this action be taken, after they cleaned out all of their local home depots and drove them out there and was having trouble with activation.

That is just one person out of many who are trying to help, while you spend hours hovering in this thread looking to use your carefully crafted but incredibly transparent attempt to look very 'logical' and 'unbiased' as a cudgel, while you attempt to de-legitimize and minimize their efforts.

Again, I feel sorry for you and hope you find peace within yourself (or at least go back to reddit).

Re: Starlink offering free internet access for 30 days for Hurricane Helene victims

#326
post #248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depends on the price of batteries, which are rapidly declining. Within the next few years the numbers will change in favor of batteries. Though it also depends on the load and having enough space/sunlight for the solar array

I can buy a used diesel/propane/gas/pick your fuel generator today for a few hundred bucks that could power most of the essentials in my house. I bought a brand new one during an extended power outage due to storms last year for $500 CAD. That and 80L of gas (~$120 CAD) can run my sump pumps, fridge, freezer, the electronic side of my furnace, my homelab server rack (including 6 PoE access points), my workstation, an…

> I do not believe that battery capacity costs will decrease by 3-4 orders of magnitude “within the next few years,”

Fair call for lithium chemistries, which will probably drop closer to one order of magnitude within 2-3 years (if the trend from the last year-to-date holds). But if we're talking about sodium ion, I wouldn't be surprised if that did drop by a couple of orders of magnitude, which is already sitting about ~140USD/kwh for consumer packs (but before shipping from China). It has a weird discharge voltage curve and needs a more capable inverter to handle it though, but at the prices I'm seeing, overcapacity is plenty affordable.

Re: Starlink offering free internet access for 30 days for Hurricane Helene victims

#328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depends on the price of batteries, which are rapidly declining. Within the next few years the numbers will change in favor of batteries. Though it also depends on the load and having enough space/sunlight for the solar array

My quick math came up short on batteries. But as you say, it's worth running those numbers every year. I can't imagine I'll be sitting here in 2030 saying "batteries aren't there yet".

> I can't imagine I'll be sitting here in 2030 saying "batteries aren't there yet".

Or if you're looking now at sodium ion. It's only just hitting the consumer market, but it's already cheap enough for energy storage at the scale GP is talking about. Might take a few years for cell quality, inverter, and charging technology to improve, but by 2030 it will be so dirt cheap to the point that it would be economically sensible for any household.

Re: Starlink offering free internet access for 30 days for Hurricane Helene victims

#329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The devices were in immediately the storm passed. Not X days later. The people who brought them in are the ones who asked for it because they have activation issues. The world and Asheville doesn't exist only for you. And as I've pointed out a lot of those towers are backhauled over starlink. They could very well have received those texts over it before fiber was restored. Even today, days later, there's people askin…

> The devices were in immediately the storm passed Fema currently only has 40 in. (Citation in another comment, kindly take my word for it). Do you know how many immediately afterwards, any data or evidence? Even wild ass guess? > The world and Asheville doesn't exist only for you. This sounds like your own bias and frustration and assumptions. I'll respond to the insult by asking we calm down and have dialogue. This…

We have videos of several people who were there the next day with Starlink. Their names are in this thread. They are the ones that had activation issues. It's not expensive and they also brought power. They met the actual first responders who lost access to firstnet

More than 40 is my guess. Understand that these are individuals. No link to charities or organizations. Just people going in on their own.

In every disaster, mobile providers bring in tower on wheels. Starlink is the cheapest provider.

Lots of cell towers these days don't have microwave. If you only get calls/SMS on a tower these days you've definitely lost your fiber connectivity. With connectivity over SATCOM or even another 4G network. i.e a hotspot.

If you find recent documents about TOW's you'll see you can lease one and they mention you have to bring your own starlink. When they tell you how much alternatives cost you'll be happy to go with it.

Re: Starlink offering free internet access for 30 days for Hurricane Helene victims

#330

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't know what you're talking about because you're not familiar with the service. That's a 30 day trial where you pay for the product and service in full and get a full refund if you don't like it. It's nothing like what's being offered right now where people are complaining about activation issues and the service just works. Usually you get an hour free on new devices. Now it's 30 days

Your response here would have been stronger had you skipped the first paragraph, a shallow dismissal. Calm down. Details on the differences is illuminating, the "you don't know what you are talking about" is unhelpful.

Well right now if you happen to have a receiver and turn it on it will work for 30 days out of the box. Before this is was 1 hour before requiring activation
Post reply on HN