Live data from Hacker News

Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

electrek.co

321–330 of 504 posts

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#321

Many comments here seem to be confusing the accessories circuit voltage with the electrical vehicle motor and drive system. The vehicle motors have a combined power output of 450KW which requires a high voltage 800V system or the wiring would be so heavy it would not be feasible. This spec appears to be the accessories circuit with Tesla pushing for a new 48V standard. That’s super smart because it immediately means…

"super smart" - more like completely obvious to everyone for decades

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#322
post #274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Realistically, using 12 volt and 48 volt for accessory systems are pretty similar. 48 volts just reduces your current, and you have to design everything for ~56 volts instead of ~14. But it's not really a different exercise.

> 48 volts just reduces your current "Just" is doing an awful lot of work in that sentence. Yes, moving from 12v to 48v reduces the current. That means you can have much smaller gauge wires, it means you lose a lot less power ( powerloss = (I I) R ), it means you use a lot less copper and it means you save a lot of weight on wiring and connectors. That is literally the point.

[deleted]

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#323
post #320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Watts = Amps * Volts (or, more scientifically, P = I * V) If something draws 48 Watts of power, you can either supply it with 4 Amps @ 12 Volt, or 1 Amp @ 48 Volt. It's the amps that determine how thick the wiring needs to be, so by lowering the amperage, you lower the amount of wiring needed. I believe the only reason cars are 12 V is because that's a practical voltage to build lead-acid batteries at (which is actua…

Resistance is proportional to the square of current. This would mean 1/16th the loss instead of 1/4th.

Nope. Consumed power is voltage*amperage, and it’s constant, so 4x more voltage means 1/4 the amps. Wire heating is I squared R, so with both I reduced and R increased the losses are just 1/4, not 1/16 of the 12V system. Because you wouldn’t keep the same wire gauges you’ve had in the 12V system, you’d reduce them to actually have some benefits from conversion.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#324
post #212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding was that nearly every production vehicle on the road is 12V and that Tesla and perhaps Audi as you mentioned are doing things differently. Who is using 400-800V systems? That sounds extremely dangerous.

They're getting mixed up, the 400-800V systems are _only_ for the motors, everything else in the car still uses low voltage. In fact, afaik every single electric car has two separate systems. There's a high voltage system (the main battery and motor(s)) and the low voltage (almost always 12v) system, usually with a traditional lead-acid 12v battery that is charged via a DC-DC converter connected to the high voltage b…

I’m speaking about the power planes. What they drive is irrelevant from the standpoint that higher voltage systems create safety issues that lower voltage systems do not have. No one is going to be ok with “occasionally being shocked by 48v” or “occasionally seeing arcing in their car from a high voltage system.”

Running 48v to a radio is not an engineering marvel. Running it safely and reliably in an automotive environment full of vibration and weather is.

If you can do that with 400v, I argue you can do it with 48v, so the secret sauce they’re sharing is less relevant than if they did this ten years ago.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#325
post #141

>48V architecture also potentially improves overall electrical efficiency for reasons that I am not sufficiently qualified to explain beyond a kindergarten level This is double bad in a green energy and EV website: On one hand, they admit they don't now why that happens, but on the other hand, they also didn't research just a bit more on that, and that's bad journalism. Most of the comment threads in this HN post are…

Eh, I'm not sufficiently qualified to explain relativistic time dilation, but I'm quite certain it exists and we can count on it.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#326

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The cybertruck has two separate steering motors for redundancy. Passenger jets have been doing "x-by-wire" for decades. Properly engineered it's as reliable as mechanical linkage.

Two motors is great and all, but that only provides motor redundancy and won't help if something happens to the electrical system. Planes are fly by wire but that's because they literally have to be, no amount of gym time will let you move the rudder on a 737 by hand.

The 737 is not fly by wire.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#327

Earlier quoted context omitted.

60 volts DC is a safety threshold. You start to move current through tissue at higher voltages.

Yes but state of your body/skin (R) and current (I) is what matters with regard to 60 volts being really dangerous (also the current path as the article below states). 60 volts is nothing UNLESS you are completely wet or sweaty. "It is estimated at 150 ohms for completely wet skin (in water), 1000 ohms for sweaty skin, and 100,000 ohms to 500,000 ohms for dry skin." Assuming a worst-case scenario with dry skin provid…

> 60 volts is nothing UNLESS you are completely wet or sweaty.

Ha, it’s always easy to tell when people have experience with these things.

Doorbell wiring is 48V. Go hold those in each hand and tell me how impossible it is to feel if your hands are dry.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#328
post #212

Audi also has a 48v architecture in use for mild hybrids like my SQ5. This is an older article but explains it well https://www.greencarcongress.com/2017/06/20170602-audi.html My 2021 is fully 48v except for an inverter for necessary 12v circuits (like cigarette outlets and the jumper pins) and a small motorcycle battery that is used for minimal 12v functionality. The mild hybrid battery is under the rear seats and s…

My understanding was that nearly every production vehicle on the road is 12V and that Tesla and perhaps Audi as you mentioned are doing things differently. Who is using 400-800V systems? That sounds extremely dangerous.

>Who is using 400-800V systems? That sounds extremely dangerous.

Every electric vehicle. And yes, it is dangerous to work on the HV circuit.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#329
post #320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Watts = Amps * Volts (or, more scientifically, P = I * V) If something draws 48 Watts of power, you can either supply it with 4 Amps @ 12 Volt, or 1 Amp @ 48 Volt. It's the amps that determine how thick the wiring needs to be, so by lowering the amperage, you lower the amount of wiring needed. I believe the only reason cars are 12 V is because that's a practical voltage to build lead-acid batteries at (which is actua…

Resistance is proportional to the square of current. This would mean 1/16th the loss instead of 1/4th.

Isn't the resistance of a wire usually modeled as a constant value?

Power dissipated in the wire as heat is proportional to the square of the current. It's equal to the voltage drop times current (P = I * V). Voltage drop is current times resistance (V = I * R). So P = I^2 * R.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#330
post #212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding was that nearly every production vehicle on the road is 12V and that Tesla and perhaps Audi as you mentioned are doing things differently. Who is using 400-800V systems? That sounds extremely dangerous.

>Who is using 400-800V systems? That sounds extremely dangerous. Every electric vehicle. And yes, it is dangerous to work on the HV circuit.

Not all of them. The Kia Niro I’m driving as a rental this week has a 240v battery. Level 3 charging it feels wildly slow compared to my car.

But yes, you’re right the increased voltages add a lot of risk that has to be managed.

Post reply on HN