Earlier quoted context omitted.
That doesn't make any sense. Under your reasoning a women can't be criticized, or it's assumed to be based on sexism. The video is just a clear example of a pampered employee doing fuck all at her high paying "tech" job. It's not relevant she's a woman, it's relevant to show that Twitter had a lot of dead weight.
> The video is just a clear example of a pampered employee doing fuck all at her high paying "tech" job. It’s quite literally not. She is showing off the perks as she does her job, we don’t see the parts of her doing her job other than he briefly touching on when she is in meetings and the like. You are assuming she isn’t doing work but nothing in the video proves it. Also the perks are literally there to entice peop…
> She is showing off the perks as she does her job, we don’t see the parts of her doing her job other than he briefly touching on when she is in meetings and the like. You are assuming she isn’t doing work but nothing in the video proves it.
Maybe, but the assumption is based on the video her own video. It's not based on her being a woman. Any dude that posts this kind of video would meet the same criticism. And since Twitter laid off a huge chunk of what appears to be dead weight, it's going to get attention.You're reading too much into it trying to ascribe sexism where it doesn't exist. Women can be criticized just like men can, that's equality.