Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, and pretty much nobody cares: https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/monero-transactions.htm... 20K transactions per day currently? A single city would have more transactions than that just from people having breakfast in the morning. And these are world-wide stats.
Ah c'mon gimme something better to chew on, this argument is cake to dismantle. (1) You don't use Monero to buy breakfast. It's for large money transfers so at least compare it to bank wires. (2) Very few people know about Monero yet. Credit cards were at 20K transactions per day at some point. If you know how to look at the chart you linked, you can see the TX count growing sustainably over several years. This is he…
And why the hell not? It's supposed to be a currency.
> It's for large money transfers so at least compare it to bank wires.
And then what, exchange to USD? That'll bind it to an exchange rate, and create the same problems BTC has. Rather than having direct use as a currency, it's a betting mechanism.
> Very few people know about Monero yet. Credit cards were at 20K transactions per day at some point.
It's been almost a decade. That's an eternity in internet terms. If it only has 20K daily users world-wide then it's failed as a currency. People usually trade with people close to them, and if there's 20K people active in the world then that suggests either a very tight knit community somewhere nobody else cares about, or a bunch of nerds all over the world.
> If you know how to look at the chart you linked, you can see the TX count growing sustainably over several years.
I see it growing way too slowly and oddly. Yeah, there's periods of growth but there's also stalls and falls, and going back and forth. Growth also tends to start from a spike. To me that suggests Monero doesn't have that much traction of its own and in a good measure profits from the failures of other crypto systems.
I'm not sure if that's an accurate analysis on my part or not, but if there actually was interest in what monero provides I'm quite confident it should be growing a lot faster and be a lot more prominent. It's the one crypto that actually wants to be a currency, and yet near nobody seems to be interested in that, preferring to gamble with BTC and ETH.
> It's a more honest comparison to include transaction counts of non-fungible cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH that people are unfortunately using as a currency for now.
Those are heavily congested, so the transaction counts is mostly what the network is capable of, not what people would like to have.
> Enjoy your CBDCs in the metaverse.
My what? If you're talking about the project I work on, we formed specifically around the rejection of cryptocurrency and in general don't care for fiat transactions either.