Earlier quoted context omitted.
- You come with lack of knowledge of the issue in the discussion. - You present half truths - You cast aspersions on Indian judiciary because supposedly Hindus will only support Hindus.(I am giving you a benefit of doubt and took liberty to convert “jury” to judiciary. If you really meant jury you should never ever discuss India) When I call that out and also tried telling you what actual minority of India* thinks ab…
I do none of those things, and your response is nothing but more pathetic attempts to redirect the discussion to be about me (ad hominem attacks/fallacies) this tells me that your positions are indefensible on their own merits, and that you have no substantial response to the actual points I raised
Since when countering lack of knowledge is known as a fallacy?
I have answered each and every half-truth filled query of yours. You chose to play victim when you found you were left with no answers.
Someone more sensible and mature would have apologized and moved-on for this sheer lack of knowledge about the issue and the country.
Perhaps I should have stopped myself when you used the term "jury" in Indian context.
Keep basking in the glory of your ignorance and keep playing a victim card!