Live data from Hacker News

Israel police uses NSO’s Pegasus to spy on citizens

calcalistech.com

321–330 of 370 posts

Re: Israel police uses NSO’s Pegasus to spy on citizens

#321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think there's a bit of distance between that motte and the initial ("standard") bailey. It isn't just the status of 'guest worker's but also the ongoing asymmetric violence, theft & active bulldozing of homes, harassment/hacking of activists' phones, military checkpoints & other core indicators of an occupied land, etc. I heard someone point out that Israel can't help but kill children in Palestine because the medi…

>I think there's a bit of distance between that motte and the initial ("standard") bailey. Isn't that the point of a motte and bailey? The motte is what you think you can defend to an outgroup member without prior convictions, or even an actively skeptical outgroup member. The bailey is what you and your ingroup believe and act upon when nobody's asking you to justify yourselves. They're very different.

Sort of - the motte is usually the strongest easily defended claim. The bailey is a much harder-to-defend claim.

In this case, there's a very easy, substantially stronger, and often-used claim that might make a better 'motte'.

Re: Israel police uses NSO’s Pegasus to spy on citizens

#322
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm only aware of one case where the US government, without warrant, actively hacked its own citizens using a 0day, which was when the FBI exploited a 0day to compromise users of TOR who, as I recall, were looking to access CSAM. Even when going after a bunch of pedophiles I think there was a good bit of controversy there. I think there may actually have been a warrant for some part of the access, idk. I'm not saying…

If the ability exists, what's to stop them from using it? Good manners? And what's the incentive for someone to tell us, if they are? Become another Snowden or Assange or Manning? Not a very compelling outcome...

What is your incentive for not stealing things from a grocery store?

Re: Israel police uses NSO’s Pegasus to spy on citizens

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you think that if Hamas and all the other militant/terrorist organizations in Gaza surrendered all of their weapons to Israel tomorrow, conditions would improve for Palestinians? Do you think Israel would accept mass Palestinian (Arab) immigration? Do you think Israel would release its control of Palestine's borders? Do you think Israel would stop evicting Arabs and establishing Jewish colonies in Palestine? If yo…

> Do you think that if Hamas and all the other militant/terrorist organizations in Gaza surrendered all of their weapons to Israel tomorrow, conditions would improve for Palestinians? Yes, absolutely. Conditions have been much much better before Hamas came to power. In fact Israelis and Gazans used to visit each other freely in the 80s and lots of Gazans worked in Israel. > Do you think Israel would accept mass Pales…

> Yes, absolutely. Conditions have been much much better before Hamas came to power. In fact Israelis and Gazans used to visit each other freely in the 80s and lots of Gazans worked in Israel.

Those are some spectacular rose tinted goggles. Gaza was a refugee camp entirely under Israeli control, and Palestinians were almost entirely doing unskilled labor in Israel. Israel decided where and if new housing could be built in Gaza, new farms, anything. They instituted a police state in Gaza, with curfews, collective punishment and other methods. People in Gaza were kept poor to work unwanted jobs for Israel. The current situation of people in Gaza is significantly better than it was then. Hamas and the PLO appeared because of the poor situation in Gaza, and Israel's iron fist, not out of the evilness of Palestinians.

> That's the crux of the matter and also deals with your comment about who the "main aggressor" is. Israel wants to remain a Jewish country, that means settle the descendants of Palestinian refugees in their current countries.

There are two problems with this line of thinking. One is, the land of Palestine is simply not a majority Jewish area. It had been a majority Arab area for hundreds of years before 1949. It is today a 50/50 Arab/Jewish area (approximately). But Israel wants to be a Jewish ethno-state, Arab Palestinians be damned. The two-state (or three-state) solution would already be a massive compromise for the Arab population, given the relative land-mass and resources vs population of the potential Palestine (or Gaza and West Bank) compared to Israel. But, Israel is not even content with that.

Your assertion that Palestinians don't want to live in a democracy is bizarre, given that they already live in one. Whether they want to live in a 50/50 Jewish/Arab Israel is irrelevant, as that is not an option Israel will ever contemplate, at least in the current framework.

The only option that remains, and what seems most likely to happen, is that Israel will continue to demoralize, kill, and harass the people of Gaza and the West Bank until such a time as the remaining Arab population will be small enough compared to the Jewish population of Israel, and then it will annex these territories into a single Israeli state with a minority (> Given what Jews have been through it should be clear why Jews feel like they need a country of their own.

This is partly understandable, partly disingenuous. While there are obvious reasons after the horrors of the Holocaust that the Jewish survivors would want to have a country of their own, there is no non-religious reason this country should have been in Palestine. A chunk of the defeated Germany, for example, would have been a much more natural and easier to create space. The region of Palestine was already inhabited in the 1940s, and the people living there had no fault or implication in the horrors of the Holocaust. But, it was impossible to create a Jewish majority state there without displacing hundreds of thousands of Arabs.

Nevertheless, history is what it is. Dissolving the state of Israel today would be at least as unjust as creating it was in the first place, and would lead to even more misery - I would not advocate for that in the slightest. Dismantling the idea of a Jewish ethno-state would be much more just, but that is a complete fantasy at this point, akin to saying that North Korea should just become a democracy. Still, Israel can't claim it's not an apartheid state while stoking a conflict on the sole reason of not wanting a significant amount of Arabs to live on its territory with full rights.

Re: Israel police uses NSO’s Pegasus to spy on citizens

#324

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is ignoring some minor details, like that Israel had to fight some real frigging wars over its bare existence, and is still facing a regional power that calls for its extinction. Looks like Israel isn't getting too much love, at least not here at HN. I maintain that we in Israel are still a very normal, western type society, if you take all these rather extreme circumstances into consideration (and, in addition,…

>I maintain that we in Israel are still a very normal, western type society, Wow that's an insane opinion. You're operating a city size ghetto and illegally annexing a part of another country. I guess in Israel that's normal!

Good to know, that there is a defining authority to tell us what is sane and what is not; well, almost...

Re: Israel police uses NSO’s Pegasus to spy on citizens

#325

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Do you think that if Hamas and all the other militant/terrorist organizations in Gaza surrendered all of their weapons to Israel tomorrow, conditions would improve for Palestinians? Yes, absolutely. Conditions have been much much better before Hamas came to power. In fact Israelis and Gazans used to visit each other freely in the 80s and lots of Gazans worked in Israel. > Do you think Israel would accept mass Pales…

> Yes, absolutely. Conditions have been much much better before Hamas came to power. In fact Israelis and Gazans used to visit each other freely in the 80s and lots of Gazans worked in Israel. Those are some spectacular rose tinted goggles. Gaza was a refugee camp entirely under Israeli control, and Palestinians were almost entirely doing unskilled labor in Israel. Israel decided where and if new housing could be bui…

> While there are obvious reasons after the horrors of the Holocaust that the Jewish survivors would want to have a country of their own,

Actually Zionism started about 50 years before the holocaust because of massacres of Jews in East Europe in the Dreyfus trial which was the last straw. Turns out Zionism was right, couldn't be more right.

> A chunk of the defeated Germany, for example, would have been a much more natural and easier to create space

No one offered, and as I say above Jews needed a place well before the holocaust. Also you're talking as if there's some just policeman who runs the world and thinks of "just" and practical solutions for everyone. There isn't any. Jews found out the hard way what could happen to them, no one offered them jack s**. Almost all countries restricted Jewish immigration before and during the holocaust.

The Palestinian predicament can be solved with fair compensation to the refugees and resettlement, a Palestinian state beside Israel in the 67 border and an end to hostilities. But they have to give up the will to destroy Israel and they can't do that it seems to me.

Re: Israel police uses NSO’s Pegasus to spy on citizens

#326
post #319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you claiming that Egypt is exercising control over Palestine's coastal waters, or airspace?

Water? Sure... just open a map: https://www.google.com/maps/@31.3241525,34.2178782,17.04z Sorry to burst our bubble. But the main reason Gaza is not going forwared is Hamas. Not Israel.

I have no idea what your map is supposed to show. Yes, Egypt has one land border with Gaza, and is often closing it, helping to maintain the blockade. But on all other routes - sea, air and other land borders, it is Israel that maintains the blockade. Egypt is not stopping any sea vessels from reaching Gaza - it is the Israeli navy that is doing so, since it controls the entire coast of Gaza. Even if a ship were to move through Egyptian waters into the Gaza coast, it would be intercepted by Israeli ships patrolling the coast.

Re: Israel police uses NSO’s Pegasus to spy on citizens

#327

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Yes, absolutely. Conditions have been much much better before Hamas came to power. In fact Israelis and Gazans used to visit each other freely in the 80s and lots of Gazans worked in Israel. Those are some spectacular rose tinted goggles. Gaza was a refugee camp entirely under Israeli control, and Palestinians were almost entirely doing unskilled labor in Israel. Israel decided where and if new housing could be bui…

> While there are obvious reasons after the horrors of the Holocaust that the Jewish survivors would want to have a country of their own, Actually Zionism started about 50 years before the holocaust because of massacres of Jews in East Europe in the Dreyfus trial which was the last straw. Turns out Zionism was right, couldn't be more right. > A chunk of the defeated Germany, for example, would have been a much more n…

> Also you're talking as if there's some just policeman who runs the world and thinks of "just" and practical solutions for everyone. There isn't any. Jews found out the hard way what could happen to them, no one offered them jack s*.

The partition of Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab state was designed by the UN and the British Empire, which retreated from the territory and let the dice fall where they may. Just another in the long series of insane borders the British Empire traced all over the Middle East, the cause of so much bloodshed over the years.

Of course, this wouldn't have happened if the Zionist movement hadn't lobbied for it, so I do agree with you that it was ultimately every man for himself. But had they petitioned for a piece of Germany, and had the European and American and Russian powers who re-drew the world been more wise, this entire situation could have been avoided. Alas, history can't be re-written, and who knows what other problems would have occurred.

Re: Israel police uses NSO’s Pegasus to spy on citizens

#328
post #319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Water? Sure... just open a map: https://www.google.com/maps/@31.3241525,34.2178782,17.04z Sorry to burst our bubble. But the main reason Gaza is not going forwared is Hamas. Not Israel.

I have no idea what your map is supposed to show. Yes, Egypt has one land border with Gaza, and is often closing it, helping to maintain the blockade. But on all other routes - sea, air and other land borders, it is Israel that maintains the blockade. Egypt is not stopping any sea vessels from reaching Gaza - it is the Israeli navy that is doing so, since it controls the entire coast of Gaza. Even if a ship were to m…

lol dude it is LITERALLY the first sentence here:

"The blockade of the Gaza Strip is the ongoing land, air, and sea blockade of the Gaza Strip imposed by Israel and Egypt in 2007"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockade_of_the_Gaza_Strip

What is even the point? Can't you just admit you are wrong and Hamas has a HUGE NEGATIVE effect on Gaza? And peace process in general?

Re: Israel police uses NSO’s Pegasus to spy on citizens

#329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Do you think that if Hamas and all the other militant/terrorist organizations in Gaza surrendered all of their weapons to Israel tomorrow, conditions would improve for Palestinians? Yes, absolutely. Conditions have been much much better before Hamas came to power. In fact Israelis and Gazans used to visit each other freely in the 80s and lots of Gazans worked in Israel. > Do you think Israel would accept mass Pales…

> Yes, absolutely. Conditions have been much much better before Hamas came to power. In fact Israelis and Gazans used to visit each other freely in the 80s and lots of Gazans worked in Israel. Those are some spectacular rose tinted goggles. Gaza was a refugee camp entirely under Israeli control, and Palestinians were almost entirely doing unskilled labor in Israel. Israel decided where and if new housing could be bui…

> The only option that remains, and what seems most likely to happen, is that Israel will continue to demoralize, kill, and harass the people of Gaza and the West Bank until such a time as the remaining Arab population will be small enough compared to the Jewish population of Israel, and then it will annex these territories into a single Israeli state with a minority (Many options remain: peace, Palestinian refugees settled where they're living in now, an Iranian nuclear attack on TLV and flight of all the Jews from there, who knows. The area is unpredictable, I'm not gonna try to predict anything.

Re: Israel police uses NSO’s Pegasus to spy on citizens

#330

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's like saying after d-day, the killing and destruction has become more one sided against the Axis Powers. Nobody takes that as a serious argument that the Allies shouldn't have done it (and please, no Nazi comparisons).

If the Allies had started bombing German civilian targets more as they were gaining an upper hand, or even had they not subsided in their bombing of civilian targets, then yes, it would be the same, and it would not be excusable. When fighting against a dirty enemy, it is mostly acceptable to be dirty in turn. But as your enemy is close to defeat and is losing any power to harm you, you're supposed to stop the dirty…

>But as your enemy is close to defeat and is losing any power to harm you, you're supposed to stop the dirty tactics that were necessary and (somewhat) justified earlier.

That is:

1) Not how international law actually works,

2) Not how anyone actually behaved in World War II,

3) Not remotely applicable before an official surrender is issued.

The law says that you have to call off military action and start releasing POWs into civilian life once their government surrenders. There is absolutely no legal or moral requirement to "let up" or "go easy" on a government that is strategically losing but refuses to surrender. This is especially so when the enemy has repeatedly invoked conditions of total war by violating the typical soldier/civilian distinction (eg: storing weapons in civilian dwellings, sending soldiers to attack without uniform or serial numbers, and various other tactics commonly labeled "terrorism" for lack of a unified legal category).

Post reply on HN