Live data from Hacker News

WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebook or stop using app

arstechnica.com

321–330 of 1001 posts

Re: WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebook or stop using app

#321

Do people still believe that Facebook doesn't collect data from the apps owned by them? Hell even the apps that is Facebook SDK send user data to Facebook even when you don't use facebook owned apps: https://media.ccc.de/v/35c3-9941-how_facebook_tracks_you_on_...

They know the Facebook Mafia does, but non of their network is moving to alternatives

Re: WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebook or stop using app

#322
post #316

It has been said that companies that build rely too heavily on the public, free API’s of another service are doomed when that service decides to monetize those API’s. See, for example, API users of Google Maps. I think we are now at the point where this applies to individuals. If a person or group of people rely too heavily on a single free service then they’re going to feel pain when that service finally decides to…

That's why I'm still sceptical of Signal. It's free as well, paid for by donations but still. At the end of the day I'm not the one paying directly for the service I'm using.

Donate! Then you are.

Re: WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebook or stop using app

#323
post #316

It has been said that companies that build rely too heavily on the public, free API’s of another service are doomed when that service decides to monetize those API’s. See, for example, API users of Google Maps. I think we are now at the point where this applies to individuals. If a person or group of people rely too heavily on a single free service then they’re going to feel pain when that service finally decides to…

That's why I'm still sceptical of Signal. It's free as well, paid for by donations but still. At the end of the day I'm not the one paying directly for the service I'm using.

If they take donations in order to fund it, doesn't that give you the option of paying for the service directly?

Re: WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebook or stop using app

#324

It has been said that companies that build rely too heavily on the public, free API’s of another service are doomed when that service decides to monetize those API’s. See, for example, API users of Google Maps. I think we are now at the point where this applies to individuals. If a person or group of people rely too heavily on a single free service then they’re going to feel pain when that service finally decides to…

This isn't about free of fees vs not. It is about changing privacy policy drastically in an era when people do actually care about privacy.

Re: WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebook or stop using app

#325

I'd love to give up WhatsApp, but network effects are key here. I tried moving my extended family off WhatsApp onto Signal a couple of years ago and it failed miserably because the app wasn't nearly as easy to use, and they had all their friends on Whatsapp. Has anyone here had any success moving a large group of people onto something like Signal or Telegram? If so, do you have any tips?

I'm wondering if someone can develop a product that addresses the networking effect problem. I.e. a service that allows groups to move their member lists seamlessly between networks and to be able to also see at a glance, which networks (e.g. WhatsApp, Signal, FB Messenger, Slack) the members are on. Perhaps a network of network memberships?

Re: WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebook or stop using app

#327
post #264

Couldn't the EU force them to standardize the protocol and to interoperate with other client/servers? With WhatsApp becoming the new defacto sms / mms it would make sense. Could they even reuse pieces of the legislation that made it happen for usb chargers?

You mean the signal protocol.

The protocol isn't really the root issue with interoperability. It's identity. As a start you should be able to easily use your verified identities across the different systems.

Signal would probably be a poor base for an interoperability standard. Which flavour would you use? Signal Messenger, Matrix, OMEMO and allegedly WhatsApp all use the Signal protocol but can not interoperate at all.

Signal Protocol is also more complex than it needs to be. It has two levels of forward secrecy for example. It is basically all the crypto geekery of the last few decades packed into a instant messaging protocol. Something intended as an interconnection standard should be as simple as possible.

Re: WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebook or stop using app

#329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Signal's not like... "tech for tech people." It's very much usable for nontechnical family members, etc.

While I agree with this 90% of the way, their backup, restore, and phone changing process is very much "tech for tech people". I've had the joy of trying to explain to my elderly dad why his text message history is lost because he chose Signal as the default sms system, didn't make a backup, didn't sync that backup to the cloud or manually copy it to the new phone, and didn't write down the very long decryption code.

Convenience vs Security - Pretty much any change made at the behest of convenience is at the expense of security. Honestly, once every 2 years having to move some files around...well, if that's the barrier that people aren't willing to push past, then we're pretty much screwed from the start.

Re: WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebook or stop using app

#330

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its worth remembering that whatsapp used to have an annual charge, and it grew successfully with that. The charge was only removed once FB bought them. Personally I don't know anyone that started using whatsapp after the fb purchase, so they were all happy to pay for their use of a messaging app.

Did they have that ever on iOS? I’ve never seen it.

Been an iPhone prisoner/beaten-wife/lover since 2010. Whatsapp charged $1 per year for update. Happy to pay that in exchange for knowing that my familyand network information and more importantly info about my kids won’t be sold for pieces million times a minute on the digital ad auction markets.
Post reply on HN