Live data from Hacker News

Amazon has proven unable or unwilling to effectively police third-party sellers

wsj.com

321–330 of 339 posts

Re: Amazon has proven unable or unwilling to effectively police third-party sellers

#321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you need extrapolation, you should read the TOS. It says you cannot use prime free shipping for items intended for resale. Buying an item to incorporate it into an item for resale is still buying for resale. If you buy items for resale, you're suppose to select a different non-prime shipping method. It has nothing to do with the first sale doctrine. If you are reselling the item, then you owe Amazon shipping charg…

> If you are reselling the item, then you owe Amazon shipping charges for 2-day shipping. Not so fast. Amazon would like this to be true, which is why they put that provision in their TOS. The NFL does the same thing when they state in every single broadcast, "This telecast is copyrighted by the NFL for the private use of our audience. Any other use of this telecast or any pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the g…

[deleted]

Re: Amazon has proven unable or unwilling to effectively police third-party sellers

#322

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you need extrapolation, you should read the TOS. It says you cannot use prime free shipping for items intended for resale. Buying an item to incorporate it into an item for resale is still buying for resale. If you buy items for resale, you're suppose to select a different non-prime shipping method. It has nothing to do with the first sale doctrine. If you are reselling the item, then you owe Amazon shipping charg…

> If you are reselling the item, then you owe Amazon shipping charges for 2-day shipping. Not so fast. Amazon would like this to be true, which is why they put that provision in their TOS. The NFL does the same thing when they state in every single broadcast, "This telecast is copyrighted by the NFL for the private use of our audience. Any other use of this telecast or any pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the g…

[deleted]

Re: Amazon has proven unable or unwilling to effectively police third-party sellers

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> just to save a few bucks by buying the cheap Chinese version. Or not knowing they're buying a cheap chinese version.

Yeah, with the problem Amazon US (maybe elsewhere too?) has with fakes which get mixed in with the real stock at the distribution centre, and the problem I have on Amazon UK where no matter what household product I search for all the results are from brands I've never heard of, many of which are obviously Chinese from the name, or I'd guess are Chinese from the weird English or the mystery chunky quotation marks all…

I recently got a dog and had a very similar experience. The only toys I could see that I could attempt to trust were Kong toys, but they were more expensive on amazon, weren’t covered by prime and the delivery time was 2-3 days.

Re: Amazon has proven unable or unwilling to effectively police third-party sellers

#324

I nearly bought a book in Audible last week, but hesitated because something seemed off with the reviews[0]. After a little digging I realised ALL the reviewers had only reviewed this book and another about Keto. And looking on Amazon for the same author "G.S. Hook" I noticed one of the books had reviews which while all unique, were basically all following the same template containing the same exact phrases[1]. I spo…

That's pretty bad, and ironic that reviews for a book about communication are all written in such broken English. Sadly fakespot.com rates that page an A so now I'm sceptical of that site too.

Yes! The first thing I did was check Fakespot. This doesn't even seem that sophisticated. Same phrases, same reviewers, I don't know how Fakespot missed it. I thought those were key markers it uses to determine the validity of reviews!

Re: Amazon has proven unable or unwilling to effectively police third-party sellers

#325
It's not surprising that the various states insisted on collecting sales tax from online sales. Free money! We don't have to do anything! We get it because we're the government!

But, the states have been derelict in their duty to protect and apply the well established protections they insist other stores comply with.

Collecting taxes is not a free lunch. It comes with serious responsibilities.

It's telling that the states are not clamoring to take on these responsibilities. If they are unwilling or unable to take up these responsibilities, then they should not be collecting the taxes.

Re: Amazon has proven unable or unwilling to effectively police third-party sellers

#326

I’ve got the same experience as many other posters here and have been buying less from Amazon lately. One thing I haven’t seen people talking about much is how profound and impact Apple Pay is for direct online retail. I used to find products on a company website and then go to Amazon to buy, mainly so I didn’t need to create yet another account, and because of prime shipping and Amazon’s return policy. The amazing t…

> One thing I haven’t seen people talking about much is how profound and impact Apple Pay is for direct online retail. I'd love to use Apple Pay, but neither of the credit cards I use for online shopping (Capital One for CAD purchases, Home Trust for non-CAD) support it.

Is there something special/different about Apple Pay for online shopping versus physical stores?

My Capital One card loaded to my iPhone has worked with Apple Pay in physical stores since the inception of the feature. I use it literally every day. In the last few days I used it at McDonald's and at Whole Foods.

Re: Amazon has proven unable or unwilling to effectively police third-party sellers

#327
post #89
post #46

That and they've gone the wall-mart route of actually PUSHING anything / the lowest price possible. I get stuff that's like 5% cheaper but quality looks to be about 50% the quality pushed on me all the time on Amazon now. I went to Amazon originally to find QUALITY products that my local stores didn't carry because of price pressures. Now Amazon seems to be switching to just being ... wall-mart and that's already nea…

It feels like the only rational explanation is "Bezos wants it like this." I know the folks at Amazon are talented, but the abject failure to optimize for quality over quantity is pretty much only explainable as intentional. I guess a second runner up would be that they're so organizationally KPI-focused, and their KPIs are so myopic, that no one actually realizes how much they're screwing up customer experience. But…

Need not forget the incredibly price sensitive crowd that is embracing Amazon.

Re: Amazon has proven unable or unwilling to effectively police third-party sellers

#328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> One thing I haven’t seen people talking about much is how profound and impact Apple Pay is for direct online retail. I'd love to use Apple Pay, but neither of the credit cards I use for online shopping (Capital One for CAD purchases, Home Trust for non-CAD) support it.

Is there something special/different about Apple Pay for online shopping versus physical stores? My Capital One card loaded to my iPhone has worked with Apple Pay in physical stores since the inception of the feature. I use it literally every day. In the last few days I used it at McDonald's and at Whole Foods.

> Is there something special/different about Apple Pay for online shopping versus physical stores?

Most notably, I could use Apple Pay for online shopping with Safari. I would not be able to use Apple Pay at physical stores as I don't have an iPhone.

Capital One Canada doesn't support Apple Pay of any variety.

Re: Amazon has proven unable or unwilling to effectively police third-party sellers

#329

So it turns out that the lead-tainted xylophone pictured in that article is sitting in my living room, along with the other items from that "Amazon's Choice" instrument set. It's all going in the trash and I'm never allowing any off-brand item from Amazon near our kids again. (I guess the fact that the xylophone wasn't tuned to any recognizable scale should have been a red flag.)

Why trash? sent it back to amazon and demand full refund.

Re: Amazon has proven unable or unwilling to effectively police third-party sellers

#330

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There was a recent study that also had crossed a threshold of anecdotes [1]: "The Attorney General’s Office, in partnership with the Washington State Department of Ecology, tested children’s school supplies for harmful levels of lead and cadmium in 2017 and 2018. The tests targeted products the two agencies suspected might contain toxic metals. In total, two rounds of tests identified 51 products sold on Amazon.com t…

There's a stack of transforms here: All amazon stuff -> Things that a protective agency through highly-developed intuition suspects will be dangerous -> things actually found to be dangerous. So it's bad news that they found dangerous things amongst a category of things that we don't want to be at all dangerous (children's school supplies). It's not surprising news that these agencies are pretty good at knowing in ad…

I agree. But it seems that they just did a reasonable thing - a quick search - bought products - tested - found 25-75% contaminated. While it should be zero. Yes, they did a reasonable search. But it is not like Amazon can't replicate that search.

The right thing to do here is to add automatic random sampling and control for lead/cadmium in the distribution facilities. And fix at least this bug, for real.

Link: https://www.atg.wa.gov/news/news-releases/ag-ferguson-amazon...

Post reply on HN