"Stablecoin" in general generates a ton of legal risk for the operators. If you can make peer-to-peer transactions with it, then the coin operators are definitely not complying with Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering laws. This will pretty reliably get the US Feds to raid your offices, seize your website and servers, arrest the principles responsible, and prosecute them. See also: Liberty Reserve. On the ot…
Coinbase is launching support for the USDC stablecoin
321–330 of 388 posts
Re: Coinbase is launching support for the USDC stablecoin
#322Stablecoins seem like they would achieve most of the goals of the original cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin: - Decentralized transactions - 24/7 access - Low fees - Store of value I suppose the only drawback here is that they're issued from a centralized authority. That said, for practical purposes the vast majority of Bitcoin holders didn't mine their own coins either. Despite this, no one on Twitter[1] seemed excit…
Satoshi's main reason for developing Bitcoin is the economic model, the other stuff just facilitates this model.
This is one of the reasons why Bitcoin has the value that it does, because the supply emission curve is known and cannot be altered.
Mistaking the things that you list as core to Bitcoin's purpose is missing the bigger picture about why Bitcoin exists.
The supply emission curve is key to understanding Bitcoin and the reason people hold it.
Re: Coinbase is launching support for the USDC stablecoin
#323Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think they mean if you are using your own wallet to store your bitcoin, then coinbase and gemini have no control over what you do with it, except not using their own services
Then back to my original point: If no exchanges allow you to deposit BTC, what are you doing with it? Once you've shamir-secret-split your multi-sig cold-storage private keys, laminated them, placed them in fireproof envelopes and dug them deep in the ground in 5 different continents... what exactly do you DO with your BTC?
Re: Coinbase is launching support for the USDC stablecoin
#324Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can avoid gemini and coinbase if you use bitcoin. You cannot avoid them if you use USDC/GUSD.
When you say "use bitcoin", what do you mean? edit: Perhaps the lesson here is the more useful something is, the less freedom you have in using it. After all, why would regulators care if you can "use bitcoin" when "use" means "play with my private keys".
Re: Coinbase is launching support for the USDC stablecoin
#325Earlier quoted context omitted.
At some point they'll want to exchange their profits for real goods and services. They will rely on some exchange service to cash out eventually.
If most of the criminal money is used to transact with other criminals, then most of the money doesn't need to convert to USD. The real kicker is whether the other criminals are willing to accept bitcoin which they know won't convert to USD.
Re: Coinbase is launching support for the USDC stablecoin
#326Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your premise is to "fix" the monetary system, but you failed to articulate the issues that you want to resolve.
Currency debasement.
Re: Coinbase is launching support for the USDC stablecoin
#327"Stablecoin" in general generates a ton of legal risk for the operators. If you can make peer-to-peer transactions with it, then the coin operators are definitely not complying with Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering laws. This will pretty reliably get the US Feds to raid your offices, seize your website and servers, arrest the principles responsible, and prosecute them. See also: Liberty Reserve. On the ot…
If you can make peer-to-peer transactions with it, then the coin operators are definitely not complying with Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering laws. You can certainly make peer-to-peer transactions with it. But I think you are misinterpreting the KYC laws. Circle (who operates USDC) isn't trying to be secretive about this. They are regulated as a "money transmitter" and a "money services business" - https:…
Re: Coinbase is launching support for the USDC stablecoin
#328Stablecoins seem like they would achieve most of the goals of the original cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin: - Decentralized transactions - 24/7 access - Low fees - Store of value I suppose the only drawback here is that they're issued from a centralized authority. That said, for practical purposes the vast majority of Bitcoin holders didn't mine their own coins either. Despite this, no one on Twitter[1] seemed excit…
you know what they say: "those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it".
>A cryptocurrency that stays the same value is not very interesting to traders and therefore most of the cryptocurrency community.
the reason most of the cryptocurrency community is traders, is because of the price volatility.
now that that is fixed, people can actually use crypto-currency as a currency and hopefully we can have an actual useful tool for an economy rather than a FOMO-fueled get-rich-quick hype-machine.
Re: Coinbase is launching support for the USDC stablecoin
#329Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does Circle keep enough dollars on hand to buy back every USDC? Or do you run a fractional reserve? How much money is that total? What do you do if you have as many USDCs in circulation as you have dollars? Stop issuing them?
Circle holds one dollar for every dollar minted, we do not run a fractional reserve. The CENTRE Consortium holds minters (of which Circle is one) to strict auditing requirements. While this information is regularly published, you can see all minting and burning operations (as well as all transfers and other token operations) in realtime on the Ethereum blockchain. See etherscan: https://etherscan.io/address/0xa0b8699…
[0] https://support.usdc.circle.com/hc/en-us/articles/3600152783...
Re: Coinbase is launching support for the USDC stablecoin
#330Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Despite this, no one on Twitter[1] seemed excited Because most people think that in order to solve the problem of a cryptocurrency, they have to also solve the problem of who gets money when you print it. Far too many people conflate the need for electronic cash versus the need to improve upon how systems like the Federal Reserve and their International equivalents work. Honestly, as a software engineer who underst…
If there is a need for electronic cash backed by USD and controlled by a central party, why use crypto/blockchain at all? To solve that problem a central database on a controlled network could do just fine?