Earlier quoted context omitted.
Liking zero indexed lists is such a dumb programmer meme. Lists are for humans to read and therefore should use the natural numbers, which start at one. Arrays are zero indexed because the first item of the array starts with zero offset.
Hours go 0:00 to 23:59 Elevators use 0 for ground floor, negative for basements, and positive for upper floors. Just two examples of zero indexed lists in real life.
I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
321–330 of 447 posts
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#322Earlier quoted context omitted.
Might not get the money back but might also get the sender 20 years prison and/or a fine: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1341
I would, irrationally, feel bad about sending someone to prison for 20y just because they stole some cash from me.
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#323Earlier quoted context omitted.
Might not get the money back but might also get the sender 20 years prison and/or a fine: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1341
I would, irrationally, feel bad about sending someone to prison for 20y just because they stole some cash from me.
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#324I had something similar happen about a year ago and it was a really bad time. I purchased some hard drives from a third-party seller (claimed as new, seemed reasonable in price, but huge mistake in hindsight, I know), and they arrived fine. The problem was, the hard drives were not what I ordered, and were almost certainly used (scratched up a lot). I requested a return, and had the seller provide me a shipping label…
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#325Earlier quoted context omitted.
This 100 times. I never buy from third-party sellers in Amazon, but I am having such a hard time explaining to friends and family how to do the same. They keep buying from third-party sellers and keep wondering how it is not "Amazon". I wish there was an option to set it once and never see third-party seller items again.
There have been a couple of previous hacker news discussions on the problem of counterfeit goods being sold by Amazon. The problem here is that if there are counterfeit goods being sold by a 3rd party, you might get them even if the product listing your ordered from says that it is sold and shipped by Amazon. Amazon co-mingles goods from Amazon and third party sellers unless the third party seller explicitly opts out…
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#326Earlier quoted context omitted.
Amazon Mexico opened a few years back and my experience has been mostly negative precisely because most of the products are sold by third parties. I just avoid amazon.mx and buy at amazon.com. Even when buying at amazon.com I only buy products sold or handled by Amazon. I've also run into problems with scams, shipping, etc, with third parties.
I had someone set up an amazon.mx account using my credentials somehow.... they ordered a bunch of online books, include a $1200 textbook. I have no idea how they were able to do it. I was able to get them to reverse all the charges pretty quickly, but I still get messages from amazon mexico saying i should buy stuff, and for a while amazon.com would ask me if i wanted to go to amazon mexico when i logged in. I have…
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#327Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is an entirely predictable outcome Said someone about every security bug ever. This is the shipping fraud equivalent of "this never would have happened if you used rust". It's not helpful.
Absolutely not. Where even is the bug? It was a policy decision, and while an argument could be constructed that nobody could have known that they'd need to use greater geographic resolution in validating shipping destinations, they already had this data in the form of shipping addresses. This isn't a "640K should be enough for everybody" situation, it's a "nobody will ever want more than 640K" situation.
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#328Earlier quoted context omitted.
People do really get their money's worth from Prime: "40% of Amazon Prime members spend over $1,000 a year on Amazon, while only 8% of non-Prime shoppers do so." I'd be really interested to see what Amazon's numbers as a whole would look like if Prime didn't exist, clearly it is profitable enough for Amazon to be able to keep bundling "free" stuff into the package like video / music, file storage etc.
I think a similar effect is at work with Costco memberships.
"The most important factor about membership fees is that they go straight to the company's bottom lines. Costco operates its warehouses on essentially a breakeven basis, making its profits on memberships instead of merchandise. "
https://www.fool.com/investing/2016/08/18/what-do-membership...
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#329Earlier quoted context omitted.
This 100 times. I never buy from third-party sellers in Amazon, but I am having such a hard time explaining to friends and family how to do the same. They keep buying from third-party sellers and keep wondering how it is not "Amazon". I wish there was an option to set it once and never see third-party seller items again.
I buy from third-party sellers all the time for hobby equipment/parts. Yes, they mostly resell bulk container-ship-specials from East Asia. But that's fine for hobbying around - sometimes you don't want to pay a lot for a bunch of M3 screws/nuts and you don't mind a poor shear strength and heads that easily strip. You know what you're getting, and the two-day shipping is very nice when you don't want to wait for an a…
They have a filter "Free Shipping by Amazon" under "Eligible for Free Shipping". It should filter out most if not all items not serviced by Amazon.
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#330Earlier quoted context omitted.
In addition, the package (listed on the USPS documentation) didn't have the correct weight, which should have been further proof that something was wrong. The package was 8oz, the lens itself, even without packaging, weighs 3.2 pounds.
Yup that seems like it, everything needed to prove that the transaction was fraudulent on the seller's part is included here by third party sources. Amazon completely blew it.