Live data from Hacker News

John Carmack on expert witnesses and 'non literal' copying

facebook.com

321–322 of 322 posts

Re: John Carmack on expert witnesses and 'non literal' copying

#321
post #309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Nobody knows how to issue this command or knows if this command works on their drive off the top of their heads." Sure they do. You overwrite the drive with a known large file and then check the checksum of it. It doesn't matter what kind of mumbo-jumbo the SSD is doing - it doesn't have phantom-double-capacity hiding in there ... if the (drive sized file) you wrote checksums out, you're done. And if you're paranoid…

No. See eg. https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/fast11/tech/full_papers...

[deleted]

Re: John Carmack on expert witnesses and 'non literal' copying

#322
post #317
post #275

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quite a chip on your shoulder there. And the irony is that you ping others for deciding who is the king of correct thought, while kingmaking yourself.

No irony here, I don't kingmake, simply deflate arrogance -- one of life's most pleasurable pastimes.

I think you're full of yourself.
Post reply on HN