India's demonetisation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes
321–330 of 336 posts
Re: India's demonetisation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes
#322Re: India's demonetisation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes
#323Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're spending 30k, paying an extra 20 for a banker's draft is insignificant. And it's not like you buy a car every week. (I also can't imagine feeling safe carrying anything like that much cash around. What if you lost it?)
Banker's drafts can be an even bigger pain in the ass in the EU, with some banks charging percentages for them... And losing one of those tends to be a Bad Thing too. Anyway, my point was that despite being rare the 200 and 500 euro notes are far from "absolutely useless".
Re: India's demonetisation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes
#324Earlier quoted context omitted.
Changing $100 notes to $200 notes will open a new black market for converting 2 x $100 notes to $200. I think just removing the $100 note is safer.
I think since India only has notes in {5,10,50,100,500,1000} denominations there might not be enough legal tender with just {5,10,50,100} to convert all {500,1000} notes, thus by introducing a new notes (bills) which look completely different than older 500 Rs, and 2000 Rs which are completely new, they can ensure that enough notes/bills are available.
Re: India's demonetisation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes
#325Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is totally unrelated to capitalism as a structure and paradigm for an economy. Let's momentarily set aside the issue of whether the US owed Iran 1.7B dollars. There are arguments on both sides but I want to point something out: The cash payment was made at the same time as the release of four Americans by Iran's regime. The Obama administration has admitted that the cash was used as leverage in negotiating their…
as you said it was used as a LEVERAGE not a ransom. US had to pay this money anyway, by timing it right they had more LEVERAGE in the negotiations and 4 innocent people got out of prison. What is wrong with that? painting this payments as ransom is wrong.
Equally true, taking hostages is a way to gain leverage by manipulating the payer's desire to protect the captives. Why do you think bank robbers and hijackers do it? Iran was unable to get that money for almost forty years, but by dangling four Americans in front of the Obama administration, they were able to collect a ten-figure cash payment out of America's coffers.
And you think there's nothing wrong with that?
The Americans are guilty of caving on their principles and giving tons of (borrowed btw) cash to hostage takers, and the Iranians are guilt of taking hostages in the first place.
Re: India's demonetisation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes
#326Earlier quoted context omitted.
> about the absolute uselessness Yeah, no. Even a relatively small amount like 30k is a major pain in the ass to carry around in 100 euro notes. 30k is what one might pay for a car, for example.
If you're spending 30k, paying an extra 20 for a banker's draft is insignificant. And it's not like you buy a car every week. (I also can't imagine feeling safe carrying anything like that much cash around. What if you lost it?)
Re: India's demonetisation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes
#327Re: India's demonetisation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes
#328It is hardly going to fix the black money problem. Rich people have so many employees to do the bank run for them. Within the next month, you will see a huge spike in real estate market. People with black money will dump it in the real estate market. (If you are not an Indian, this is how it works. You buy an apartment/home/building for the amount X. But you declare it to the government that you bought it for X/10. T…