Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code to be removed from Anthropic's Pro plan?

bsky.app

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

311–320 of 676 posts

Re: Claude Code to be removed from Anthropic's Pro plan?

#311

Post by warunsl »

dzink wrote: post #294

Claude has become practically unusable for Pro users in the past few days. The Opus 4.7 blew through an entire 5 hour limit in one question and didn’t even finish answering it. Zero value delivered. Opus 4.6 is giving 2, maybe 3 questions before blowing through the Pro 5 hour limit as well. We are forced to use Sonnet which makes the same mistakes over and over and then to start trying with other companies. To make m…

I thought it was just me. Even 4.6 is hitting limits so much sooner which I would have expected of 4.7

Re: Claude Code to be removed from Anthropic's Pro plan?

#313

Post by sally_glance »

simonw wrote: post #270
rideontime wrote: post #209

Anthropic’s “Head of Growth” claims this is a “test”: https://x.com/TheAmolAvasare/status/2046724659039932830 This does not explain the changes to documentation.

They later said: https://twitter.com/TheAmolAvasare/status/204672549859272297... > When we do land on something, if it affects existing subscribers you'll get plenty of notice before anything changes. Will hear it from us, not a screenshot on X or Reddit. If you don't want things like this spreading through screenshots of X and Reddit, don't run "tests" like this in the first place! (Also "if it affects existing subs…

Maybe a silly bet where the head of sales had 1-2 glasses of wine too much... "I bet they will still pay us 20 bucks/mo without CC! Don't believe me? I'm going to prove it!"

Re: Claude Code to be removed from Anthropic's Pro plan?

#314

Post by redox99 »

jareds wrote: post #226

All I want is a reasonably priced subscription combining both coding AI and general AI in a single bill for non professional use that allows me to opt out of my data being used for training. Google limits history to 72 hours if you opt out of training even if you pay them $20 a month which rules them out for me. I guess I'm going to try the $20 chat gpt plan. At this point I am wondering if I need to accept that were…

Chatgpt $20 plan is a steal. There's nothing close.

Re: Claude Code to be removed from Anthropic's Pro plan?

#315

Post by joecool1029 »

rideontime wrote: post #209

Anthropic’s “Head of Growth” claims this is a “test”: https://x.com/TheAmolAvasare/status/2046724659039932830 This does not explain the changes to documentation.

Random data point: Guest passes apparently still include Claude Code in their Pro trial. If they are running a test this is a really sloppy way to do it.

Re: Claude Code to be removed from Anthropic's Pro plan?

#316

Post by toraway »

Wowfunhappy wrote: post #290

Is Claude Code actually useful on the Pro plan? I remember when they first added Claude Code to Pro — it was limited to Max initially — and my first thought was that it seemed kind of stupid, because at one fifth of my current limit, I would be hitting walls all the time...

It was for about the first 6 months after I subscribed, then the rate limits were tightened to the point of uselessness and pushed me to cancel and go for the Codex plan instead.

Re: Claude Code to be removed from Anthropic's Pro plan?

#317

Post by alexjplant »

dzink wrote: post #294

Claude has become practically unusable for Pro users in the past few days. The Opus 4.7 blew through an entire 5 hour limit in one question and didn’t even finish answering it. Zero value delivered. Opus 4.6 is giving 2, maybe 3 questions before blowing through the Pro 5 hour limit as well. We are forced to use Sonnet which makes the same mistakes over and over and then to start trying with other companies. To make m…

My personal LLM coding stack is now OpenCode, Claude Sonnet for ideation on spec with OpenWhispr for voice-to-text, GLM-5.1 for the orchestrating loop, GLM-4.7 for coding, and DeepSeek R1 for review and validation. It works much, much better than the Claude Code setup I have at work for substantially less money to boot.

At this rate I fully anticipate being able to run a comparable stack on a 128GB Mac Studio using quants of newer-generation distilled OSS models in a year or two. Being able to ramble to a computer for an hour about features and technical philosophy then have it build a nearly-working app for $50 is an exciting feeling. There's still a long tail of productionization and fixing what the model didn't adhere to but it's still incredible.

Re: Claude Code to be removed from Anthropic's Pro plan?

#318

Post by koshergweilo »

Wowfunhappy wrote: post #290

Is Claude Code actually useful on the Pro plan? I remember when they first added Claude Code to Pro — it was limited to Max initially — and my first thought was that it seemed kind of stupid, because at one fifth of my current limit, I would be hitting walls all the time...

I would say it's definitely useful for side projects. You have to manage your context windows a bit more but it's still definitely worth the money
Post reply on HN