Live data from Hacker News

Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

ai.meta.com

311–320 of 392 posts

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#311
post #300
post #270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People are the one with money, though, at the end of the day.

you dont need money if you have resources and manpower

You think that manpower will work for free? And the resources will just turn into product at no cost?

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#313
post #140

https://meta.ai/share/pe4HxOfv2Bp Finding a little bit tricky to evaluate because the harness is unfortunately very, very bad (e.g. search is awful). Can't wait to try this in some real external services where we can see how it performs for real. Definitely getting ordinary high-quality results, overall. But hard to test agentic behavior and hard to test prose quality, even, when just working off of the default chat…

This seems pretty good.

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#316

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What people seem to miss is that they don't need to get the investment back from people, they will get it from machines.

Could you explain how you think that's going to work? Because to me it seems that until machines have bank accounts, there's no money for them to get.

People make mistake of thinking that their only way of making money is directly selling tokens. They miss the fact that if you have AGI it’s better to keep tokens to yourself and sell final results instead. When we all loose jobs it’s not going to be to somebody using their tokens, it’s going to be to them selling final products. Selling tokens will be to them like selling books by Amazon, their revenue will be dominated by self branded services and products that doesn’t require exposing AGI internals directly. Tokens API will always be nerfed.

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#318

Comes impressively close to GPT 5.4 / Gemini 3.1 Pro / Opus 4.6! Mostly behind OpenAI on coding/agentic benchmarks, behind Google on text reasoning, behind Anthropic on Humanity's Last Exam with tools (surprisingly the only benchmark where Anthropic leads currently). Meta hasn’t fully caught up, but they came close and I think can solidly claim to be a frontier lab again. I’d call it a 3.5 horse race right now, and h…

Grok code was my daily driver for months while it was free and it was fantastic - it is certainly no worse than it was a few months ago.

Unfortunately with LLMs everything is based off your use case, domain and the context you give it. I also use Grok daily for health questions as the other models are too afraid to give input on medical matters

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#319

This really reinforces the idea that the AI race and the Railroad Mania of the 19th century are very similar. So many different companies are going to have similarly powerful ai that there will be no moat around it and it will be cheap. They will never earn their investment back.

[dead]

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#320

> Muse Spark is a natively multimodal reasoning model with support for [...] visual chain of thought [...]. Do they mean "the chain of thought is visible to the user" (ie. not hidden like ChatGPT), or "the medium of the chain of thought is not text, but visuals" (ie. thinking in images). I'd guess the former, since it wouldn't be economical to generate transient images, just for thinking. But I'm not sure why they'd…

Perhaps more importantly, will their chain of thought be "real"? So far the ones I've seen seem to be elaborate fakery. They look good unless you dig in at which point you often find that it merely looks plausible on the surface but that something else is going on under the hood.
Post reply on HN