Live data from Hacker News

Wisconsin communities signed secrecy deals for billion-dollar data centers

wpr.org

311–320 of 383 posts

Re: Wisconsin communities signed secrecy deals for billion-dollar data centers

#311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Obviously data center bidders would prefer their activity to be kept in the dark, but does that make for good outcomes for anyone else except the bidders. First, the community would like to weigh in on whether they want a data center or not, often they don't. Then if they do, they'd rather have a bidding war than some NDA backroom deal with a single entity. All this does is serve Big Tech and Big Capital, and they do…

> the community would like to weigh in on whether they want a data center This is the enabler of pure NIMBYism and we have to stop thinking this way. If a place wants this kind of land use and not that kind, then they need to write that down in a statute so everyone knows the rules. Making it all discretionary based on vibes is why Americans can't build anything.

> If a place wants this kind of land use and not that kind, then they need to write that down in a statute so everyone knows the rules.

Ironically this is a recipe for how you get nothing built. Zoning laws are much more potent than people showing up at city council meetings.

Re: Wisconsin communities signed secrecy deals for billion-dollar data centers

#312
post #275

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why shouldn't permits be withheld on ethical grounds? Isn't that just giving permission for companies to be unethical and get away with it?

If a government wants to penalize companies for unethical behavior, they should pass a neutral and generally applicable law that provides for such penalties. Withholding permission to do random things based on ad hoc judgments of the company involved is a recipe for corruption.

Clearly there needs to be room for both things to occur. You should absolutely begin with passing laws, but to think that the laws on the books can cover every situation is naive. When companies skirt the law and cause harm, there needs to be a remedy.

Re: Wisconsin communities signed secrecy deals for billion-dollar data centers

#313
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are capable of considering effects of systems outside of your immediate, moment-to-moment needs?

are _you_ capable of consdering the advantages that AI can bring instead of simply focusing on the easy parts like pollution and energy?

AI has incredible potential for both

But the negatives are spiraling out of control. Pollution and energy and the amplification of structural social problems like wealth stratification, authoritarianism, media manipulation...

With great power comes great responsibility, and we're living in an era in which our culture has shifted dramatically towards accepting immoral, short-sighted, and reckless behaviour.

Re: Wisconsin communities signed secrecy deals for billion-dollar data centers

#314
post #313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

are _you_ capable of consdering the advantages that AI can bring instead of simply focusing on the easy parts like pollution and energy?

AI has incredible potential for both But the negatives are spiraling out of control. Pollution and energy and the amplification of structural social problems like wealth stratification, authoritarianism, media manipulation... With great power comes great responsibility, and we're living in an era in which our culture has shifted dramatically towards accepting immoral, short-sighted, and reckless behaviour.

you could have said the same about any technology - industrial revolution, the internet - anything really.

always easy to talk about concerns.

Re: Wisconsin communities signed secrecy deals for billion-dollar data centers

#315
post #39

I'd like to hear the argument for why this is needed. I can imagine a number of reasons, but this is all I found in the article: > If I’m a company considering making strategic investments... I don’t want my competition to know where I’m going, what I’m doing, what pace I’m doing it at... You want to make sure everything is buttoned up and bow tied before that type of information is put into the public realm. I'm hav…

What I've come to realize is that the rust belt states have been in huge trouble for decades. They were living in "benevolent feudalism" when GM, Ford, etc all had factories there. The problem is that these companies effectively owned the cities in which they operated. And then they left. Since the Reagan years we decided to export everything that built our economy so the landlords in power could have even more profi…

Absolutely this. It's no wonder why these states are also culturally grounded in terms of "command and hierarchy". If GM fires you, it's end of the line for you.. good luck serving hot meals at Cracker Barrel.

Re: Wisconsin communities signed secrecy deals for billion-dollar data centers

#316
post #132

I live near one of these projects by chance. It seemed like back door deals for land which some happened to be sold by a former Oracle exec then magically the tax district approved unanimously by For extra fun today the WI Realtors Association and other groups are suing the city to stop an upcoming vote from an accepted petition that forced approving projects over tax financed projects $10 million dollars get voter a…

WI Realtors Association and other groups are suing the city to stop an upcoming vote

Everyone likes to complain about politicians, with good reason) but we don't talk enough about the people who are trying to buy them as a means to cut out the voters.

Re: Wisconsin communities signed secrecy deals for billion-dollar data centers

#317
post #301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's pretty wild. People around me are complaining that their electric bill tripled and blaming data centers for it. No, your rates didn't triple in the last year. Your bill went up because you used way more electricity, probably because it's been ass-freezingly cold.

My rate has been consistently 40-60% higher over the last year independent of weather

Your rate, or your bill? I'm seeing people complain about their bills. None of them ever come back and discuss how much of the change was due to changes in their rate versus changes in their usage.

Re: Wisconsin communities signed secrecy deals for billion-dollar data centers

#318

Wisconsin runs mostly on coal power plants. It's a terrible place to build data centers. My guess is that the locals have proven themselves easily dazzled by the contract dollar amounts and arent thinking about the future. Remember the FoxConn debacle? That was WI.

I was about to ask where they plan on getting the extra power. They are anti solar and wind, so they will either need to burn coal or import it or both (or change the laws!)

Re: Wisconsin communities signed secrecy deals for billion-dollar data centers

#319
post #39

I'd like to hear the argument for why this is needed. I can imagine a number of reasons, but this is all I found in the article: > If I’m a company considering making strategic investments... I don’t want my competition to know where I’m going, what I’m doing, what pace I’m doing it at... You want to make sure everything is buttoned up and bow tied before that type of information is put into the public realm. I'm hav…

Secrecy in real estate negotiations is common enough that it's an exemption in many state FOIA laws.

Re: Wisconsin communities signed secrecy deals for billion-dollar data centers

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A scourge? I get some kind of valuable use from it almost every day. This criticism sounds completely out of touch.

Commensurate to the actual cost?

Compared to the fair market cost of human labor? It might be thousands of times more efficient.
Post reply on HN