Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

jQuery 4

blog.jquery.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

311–313 of 313 posts

Re: jQuery 4

#311

Post by flomo »

phatskat wrote: post #305
flomo wrote: post #262

Earlier quoted context omitted.

After having some time to think about it, I've seen some really perverse DOM stuff in jquery. Like $(el).next().children(3) type stuff. So I think this stuff really fell-over when there was 'too much state' for the DOM.

I think if you want to go high-dom manipulation a la jQuery, and want some form of complex state, storing the state _on_ the DOM might make sense? Things like data attributes and such, but I also feel like that’s itching for something more like htmx or maybe svelte (I’ve not looked into either enough, so I may be completely off base). I do agree with the notion that jQuery is easy to mishandle when logic grows beyond…

Yeah, that's the thing, it might make sense in some simple 1-dimensional case, but beyond that it turns into spaghetti code (or a homebrew 'framework'). The big thing is that if you want to re-gigger some of the DOM, React is actually a lot nicer than jquery.

Re: jQuery 4

#312

Post by phatskat »

flomo wrote: post #311
phatskat wrote: post #305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think if you want to go high-dom manipulation a la jQuery, and want some form of complex state, storing the state _on_ the DOM might make sense? Things like data attributes and such, but I also feel like that’s itching for something more like htmx or maybe svelte (I’ve not looked into either enough, so I may be completely off base). I do agree with the notion that jQuery is easy to mishandle when logic grows beyond…

Yeah, that's the thing, it might make sense in some simple 1-dimensional case, but beyond that it turns into spaghetti code (or a homebrew 'framework'). The big thing is that if you want to re-gigger some of the DOM, React is actually a lot nicer than jquery.

I’ll die on the “give me Vue over react any day” hill in that case, admittedly because I think React’s template/code mix is atrocious. I also _feel_ like React suffers from “why not do everything” syndrome, and that’s from a very naive perspective so grain or mountain of salt

Re: jQuery 4

#313

Post by flomo »

phatskat wrote: post #312
flomo wrote: post #311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, that's the thing, it might make sense in some simple 1-dimensional case, but beyond that it turns into spaghetti code (or a homebrew 'framework'). The big thing is that if you want to re-gigger some of the DOM, React is actually a lot nicer than jquery.

I’ll die on the “give me Vue over react any day” hill in that case, admittedly because I think React’s template/code mix is atrocious. I also _feel_ like React suffers from “why not do everything” syndrome, and that’s from a very naive perspective so grain or mountain of salt

Yeah, I'm not hyping react specifically, just point out that vanilla/jquery or even htmx only works well when the state is not that complicated.
Post reply on HN