If this would come out for Bolt that my tip won't reach 100% to driver/delivery guy, I would quit using it. Lying to users about especially when they want to be generous is like fake beggars.
It doesn't matter if 10% of users quit using it if the stolen tips from the other 90% more than cover it. And where are you going to run? The competition isn't any better.
I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
311–316 of 316 posts
Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#312Earlier quoted context omitted.
He got caught because someone recognized his uniquely bushy eyebrows from the wanted photos. This is all documented, no need for advanced theorizing.
> This is all documented, no need for advanced theorizing. Something being documented doesn't make it true: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction
Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#313Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#314Believability aside (I do think it’s believable personally) this is pretty much how “evil” (from outsider perspective) is done at every company, including mine. Inside it’s all sprint meetings, KPIs and terminology that are either intentionally or unintentionally designed to keep engineers far from thinking about impact on real people. It’s easy to convince a 25 year old whiz kid to optimize human assets, it’s just l…
Engineers are completely blindsided by technology. I work with some brilliant people, technically speaking, but in some cases they seem to have 0 awareness towards the things they are building and how that affects the people using the things that we built. I had a couple of months ago an engineer that's working on various AI things in our company telling me how we can use and build an AI tool to rate the performance…
Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#315Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I am 95% convinced he was caught because we live in a surveillance panopticon. I'm sure this is unpopular opinion but I'm glad we can catch murderers quickly which technology. The flip side is worse. Note: This has nothing to do with the reasons for murdering which I'm not going to debate.
> I'm glad we can catch murderers quickly which technology. According to whom? Homicide clearance rates in the US have been getting worse for decades [1][2]. The same is true in the UK, another surveillance state, where only 10% of violent offenses get solved [3]. This promise of a crime-free utopia has been nothing but a deceptive manipulation of the public and the scary part is that it keeps working. [1] https://ww…