Live data from Hacker News

Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

bleepingcomputer.com

311–318 of 318 posts

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#311
post #266
post #260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You can manually and independently check the image signature before flashing an update. Of course you can. You can also read the ToS before clicking accept, but who does that?

I'm sure there are dozens of us.

Ever since that one game with the soul-surrendering clause in the EULA, I read it all now, heh.

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#312

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This already happens in the Netherlands, your router will be put in quarantine mode and you have to prove that the "virus" is gone This happened to me, at the time I thought it was strange but seeing this event happen it makes a lot more sense now

was router not provided by your own isp?

In Australia you can byo router-modem which are generally better than those provided by isp.

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#313
post #236
post #98

This is what I don't get >The Aisuru DDoS botnet operates as a DDoS-for-hire service with restricted clientele; operators have reportedly implemented preventive measures to avoid attacking governmental, law enforcement, military, and other national security properties. Most observed Aisuru attacks to date appear to be related to online gaming. https://www.netscout.com/blog/asert/asert-threat-summary-ais... So why? Li…

> What's the benefit of taking down an online game for a couple of hours. Competitive MMO. Imagine some event is setup to start at some time and your guild or alliance knows they're gonna lose it and the resource it gives: DDOS the server so it's down during the event so it does not run. Enjoy the fact you kept the asset linked to said event and sell the resources you get for real money. If you've never played those…

My online gaming days are basically non-existent the last decade, but seeing stuff like this makes me want to make my comeback. The funny and bizarre stories I have from WoW...

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#314
post #263
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep. Manufacturers / distributors should be held responsible. Aligning the incentives is half the battle.

A "do not connect to the cloud" physical flip switch on the IoT device is what I want. Where can I sign the petition for that?

A physical switch is extra BoM / cost, and doesn't make sense in the context of a networked device. Just make it LAN-first / LAN-only. Any Internet-enabled features should happen on the gateway, and be opt-in.

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#316
post #221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

back in '98 i got a 100mb per download limit for $100 on my cable connection. i recall getting DoS'd by someone cause i was a lpb barstard in quake tf. They were kind though, only DoS'd me 90mb as a warning.... Years later, TF2 is getting DoS'd into oblivion, an extorhted by DDoS for hire. Some things change, some things stay the same.

I'm old enough to remember this site called kuro5hin, and how it folded a bit after it got DoS'd to death around 2000

for those not old enough to remember, that's pronounced "corrosion"

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#317
post #239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

do you really think for example America would allow say Chinese prosecutors to arrest Americans on American soil and take them abroad to sentence them in a court that America has no influence over and then throw them in a prison which America doesn’t control?

>America would allow say Chinese for at least 6 months https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c785n9pexjpo https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/new-york-resident-pl...

it was secret because it was not allowed.

Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

#318
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

do you really think for example America would allow say Chinese prosecutors to arrest Americans on American soil and take them abroad to sentence them in a court that America has no influence over and then throw them in a prison which America doesn’t control?

When the deed is illegal in both places, they can be tried under either jurisdiction and convicted instead of continuing to roam free and fuck up the open web for everyone else. Yes I do think we'd want that Borders currently get in the way but we needn't have law enforcement on foreign soil to solve that. Exchanging information and reliably acting upon it could be all these agencies need to do in their respective co…

you really think that U.S. would hand over U.S. citizens to, say, Venezuela for crimes that are illegal in both U.S. and Venezuela?
Post reply on HN