Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah... Does it support WhatsApp? If not that's a deal-breaker in most of the world.
Most of the world loves being shackled by a Meta product for some reason. The allegiance to WhatsApp is mindbending.
Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move
311–320 of 564 posts
Re: Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move
#312Installing any app I want outside the Play Store was the primary reason I decided to go with Android, despite most of the people I know using iPhones. If I can't do this anymore, I may as well switch and be able to use iMessage and FaceTime with them.
You can still side-load signed apps. It's a similar limitation to macOS which won't let you run apps that Apple hasn't signed without command line or control panel shenanigans. Compared to iOS, Android still has the advantage of installing your own full browser (like Firefox) with full-fat ad blocking (uBlock Origin, not Lite). iOS is Safari-only right now though, in theory, some alternative engines may be available…
Re: Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move
#313Installing any app I want outside the Play Store was the primary reason I decided to go with Android, despite most of the people I know using iPhones. If I can't do this anymore, I may as well switch and be able to use iMessage and FaceTime with them.
You can still install apps outside the play store, but the developer does need to verify their signing information. Effectively this means that any app you install must have a paper trail to the originating developer, even if its not on the app store. On one hand, I can see the need for this to track down virus creators, but on the other, it provides Google transparency and control over side loaded app. It IS a conce…
Re: Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move
#314Installing any app I want outside the Play Store was the primary reason I decided to go with Android, despite most of the people I know using iPhones. If I can't do this anymore, I may as well switch and be able to use iMessage and FaceTime with them.
Sideloading was the killer feature for me as well.
Re: Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move
#315This is the beginning of the end of Android. Google have over-reached. It is unacceptable to software developers to be unable to install software on their own phones, and this will lead to a successor to Android. It will take time, but it will now happen.
If that actually were the case, the iPhone would've died in 2007. In reality, most people don't even know what sideloading is. Those are the people who are buying phones and supporting the market for their existence. The 0.001% of people who want to side load applications onto their phone, can clamor for a new OS all they want, but unless they put the resources in place to make that happen, it won't.
But there was Android. If you cared about loading, you could ditch Apple. You had something else to go to.
Now there's nothing.
Re: Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move
#316Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes because technically literate users shouldn’t have trusted mainstream companies to not install bundle ware back in the Day? They shouldn’t have trusted Zoom not to install a web server on Macs surreptitiously that caused a vulnerability? They shouldn’t have searched Google for printer drivers not knowing that it was a fake printer driver? They shouldn’t have trusted Facebook when they installed VPN software that t…
Technically illiterate users should leave the default security settings enabled. In the modern day, I actually think this mostly works? Are you aware of instances where normies installed Windows malware because they purposefully disabled Windows Defender? Everyone always talks about the "Dancing Bunnies Problem" but I'm not convinced it's actually a thing.
On the Mac, people installed Zoom and it installed a backdoor web server.
Re: Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move
#317This is the beginning of the end of Android. Google have over-reached. It is unacceptable to software developers to be unable to install software on their own phones, and this will lead to a successor to Android. It will take time, but it will now happen.
> beginning of the end of Android. You underestimate how much money & effort it takes to make an operating system.
Re: Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move
#318Installing any app I want outside the Play Store was the primary reason I decided to go with Android, despite most of the people I know using iPhones. If I can't do this anymore, I may as well switch and be able to use iMessage and FaceTime with them.
Then you'd be rewarding the company that pioneered and normalized taking away these rights. The next rights you'll lose will probably originate on Apple again years before Google takes them away too.
Re: Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move
#319Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Installing any app I want outside the Play Store was the primary reason I decided to go with Android You still can do that with PWAs in Android. Let's see for how long.
Do you have a single friend who isn't a programmer who has installed a PWA in the last two years?
Re: Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move
#320Installing any app I want outside the Play Store was the primary reason I decided to go with Android, despite most of the people I know using iPhones. If I can't do this anymore, I may as well switch and be able to use iMessage and FaceTime with them.
I have the feeling Google has given up on using nerds as beachheads. The market is saturated enough and they don't need us anymore to do grass roots spreading of their products. It's the same with Youtube. As long as there were enough people who were unencumbered by ads because of their ad block and kept spreading links, the importance of Youtube was growing. After market saturation that vehicle isn't necessary anymore and they can squeeze them out.