Introducing Outlook.com - Modern Email for the Next Billion Mailboxes
311–320 of 341 posts
Re: Introducing Outlook.com - Modern Email for the Next Billion Mailboxes
#312Re: Introducing Outlook.com - Modern Email for the Next Billion Mailboxes
#313Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was setting up my wife's account for youtube and accidentally put today's date in for her birthdate. I was immediately locked out and had to pay a fee to get her email back.
and share how much the fee was... ("accepting and verifying a credit card number in connection with a transaction" is one of the COPPA approved methods of verifying adulthood)
Re: Introducing Outlook.com - Modern Email for the Next Billion Mailboxes
#314Re: Introducing Outlook.com - Modern Email for the Next Billion Mailboxes
#315We haven't instantly forgotten how Microsoft handles Skydrive, have we?: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4265086 I think I'll pass on putting my email through their systems. Although I have to admit this looks way better than GMail. I hope this inspires Google to do something about their interface design.
I use my old mac.com and new me.com emails and it works beautifully. The iCloud mail interface as well as everything else about the experience is just great. Very, very little spam, lightning fast, no ads, integration with my iCal and therefore easily accessed from all of my devices. Gmail is good, but I find it's overrated.
Re: Introducing Outlook.com - Modern Email for the Next Billion Mailboxes
#316Earlier quoted context omitted.
And I'm going to hope and pray that google stops screwing with their interface design. Gmail was perfect.
>> Gmail was perfect. Comments about perfect technology keep popping up on hn. I would think that claiming any technology is "perfect" is a little self-defeating coming from a tech startup news site? The very core of what we all stand for here is advancing mankind (or making the world a better place) through whatever means we are capable (most often technology). Viewing existing technologies as "perfect" closes the m…
Re: Introducing Outlook.com - Modern Email for the Next Billion Mailboxes
#317 Your password can't be longer than 16 characters.
... we provide an inbox with ... rock solid account protection
powered by your Microsoft account ...
Those two do not chime that well.Re: Introducing Outlook.com - Modern Email for the Next Billion Mailboxes
#318Re: Introducing Outlook.com - Modern Email for the Next Billion Mailboxes
#319Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not trying to be smug, but I bet you're younger than 30, if you can say that with a straight face.
Suppose we move 20 years forward. Are we going to see this type of comment regardless of what the company would be at that time? "No way, man! I bet you're younger than 50, if you... " Do you really think that ghosts from the past need to haunt people's minds for that long regardless of how the state of the world has changed? I perceive none of MS and Google as being protective of their users or respectful of said us…
In any case, the topic wasn't about which is fair or not, but rather about what the public image of Google vs. Microsoft is and I strongly disagree with your sentiment that Google generally appear more corrupt than Microsoft does. At least if we're talking the tech-savvy part of this worlds population.
Re: Introducing Outlook.com - Modern Email for the Next Billion Mailboxes
#320Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think gmail is as close to a "mail as a service" as you can get. You can get your own domain pretty easily, and yes Google charges you for it. You can hook up plenty of 3rd party native clients to it - if you want, you never have to use the web interface at all (9x% of my gmail usage is from Mac and iOS native clients).
True, and I pay for it for blekko.com, but there was no amount of money I could give them that would let me have the old gmail interface back. That was sad for me.
http://jasoncrawford.org/2012/04/how-to-cope-with-the-gmail-...
The stuff I cared about anyway. I agree it is sad.