Live data from Hacker News

Bitcoin is over $100k

tradingview.com

311–320 of 350 posts

Re: Bitcoin is over $100k

#311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What denial? It is an excellent way to gamble or launder money. That's not changed, but it's not expanded either.

Bitcoin is the only sound money in existence. It will slowly devour fiat currency over time and humanity will benefit. There are quite a few similarities to the fall of monarchies.

It's good in some ways - value goes up, independent of governments - but bad in others - too unstable in value for day to day transactions, wages, mortgages and the like.

Re: Bitcoin is over $100k

#313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gambling, money laundering, and more gambling. This is just a repeat of all the companies that promised people could get rich using them, then the price collapsed and they all died.

Question was asking for companies doing well that weren’t exchanges.

True, I had just responded to another comment with this so I had a chuckle.

> What denial? It is an excellent way to gamble or launder money. That's not changed, but it's not expanded either.

Re: Bitcoin is over $100k

#314

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gambling, money laundering, and more gambling. This is just a repeat of all the companies that promised people could get rich using them, then the price collapsed and they all died.

Less money laundering than cash obviously

There is no such thing as an all cash startup.

Re: Bitcoin is over $100k

#315
post #267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> inconsequential $100k bonus in my portfolio It seems we are truly ducking poor here in the EU. My parents have been running a farm for 40 years in the Netherlands and they’re doing well financially. Still, $100k is not inconsequential for them!

The world is split into two kids of people: the ones that have managed to take advantage of the massive financialization of the world, and the ones who haven’t.

> the ones that have managed to take advantage of the massive financialization of the world

This group is further split into two kinds of people: Those who had an opportunity to take advantage of the massive financialization of the world, and those who weren't afforded that opportunity.

Re: Bitcoin is over $100k

#316

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Go to South Africa and tell me if it feels safe. Specifically the rich areas.

Funny you say that - I was just in Johannesburg- which neighborhoods are you referring to?

I didn't go to Johannesburg because my friend had gotten car jacked the week before. In my 4 months in cape town I was the only member of my friend group that didn't get mugged (most with guns).

But Clifton and Camps Bay were super nice. One late night I made a sandwich for the security guard my friend's neighborhood had to hire to stand outside with a kalashankof at night, he was grateful.

Compare that to other more poor African nations, there isn't 1/1000 the tension in the air as there is in SA. The reason for that is the extreme difference in wealth tied to racial tensions.

Re: Bitcoin is over $100k

#317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok, where are the bad things from this century caused directly from rich people getting richer and nothing else? And moreover - tell me how your prosperity harms the poorest in the world and what you’re doing to reduce that gap between you and them.

> where are the bad things from this century caused directly from rich people getting richer and nothing else? Tell me you’re oblivious to the world around you without telling me you are oblivious. Are you arguing that income inequality is good? Or that it’s simply nothing to worry about? Because I agree with neither.

Not trying to make assumptions, but it appears he is trying to lean into the "greed is good" line of thinking where vices are actually spun to be virtues. Not only does it allow you to avoid empathy for your fellow man, it allows you to excuse your own excesses as necessary (or even good)

Re: Bitcoin is over $100k

#318
post #308
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

2 out of the 3 companies you listed have nothing to do with crypto.

Polymarket and Stake use crypto on the backend to facilitate the gambling. It's actually quite functional for that speaking as someone who's used Polymarket.

Yes, both only legal because of their offshore status.

Mainstream adoption seems farther away due to this recent price spike. The money is attracting the wrong people, as it usually does.

Re: Bitcoin is over $100k

#319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> inconsequential $100k bonus in my portfolio It seems we are truly ducking poor here in the EU. My parents have been running a farm for 40 years in the Netherlands and they’re doing well financially. Still, $100k is not inconsequential for them!

Nearly half of folks in the US have no way of paying an unexpected $1,000 expense. $100,000 isn't inconsequential to the majority of the world.

Is this true? The few net worth government statistics I can find from a quick google search point at median net worth, excluding house equity, to be significantly higher than $1k, so I wonder what I am missing. Is the implication that a person with $100k in their 401k still cannot cash flow $1k in an emergency? Totally happy to be educated.

Would love to see some data, as anecdotally, living in the Bay Area, I cannot at all relate to your comment given the massive amount of wealth virtually anyone I know has. People routinely drop $1k on a couple of mid-tier restaurant dinners around here (restaurant prices show that a drink these days is $25, crazy, good thing I stopped consuming alcohol), which I do understand is an outlier. Thanks.

Re: Bitcoin is over $100k

#320

$1k, $10k, $100k. Watching this nonsensical hype at every stage left me in disbelief. Funny thing is after all these years I’m finally realizing there’s no reason whatsoever why it couldn’t hit $1M, $1B, or go back to $1. Anytime we see a dollar symbol we assume something has value like a traditional asset, tied to tangible or measurable things like material costs, a company’s quarterly earnings, etc. But cryptocurre…

The amount of money flowing into it has been a real shock. I too played with bitcoin many years ago, mining on my CPU. Like a sucker I got rid of it because it clearly was not useful at its stated purpose. Why have we created an economy where this kind of speculation is rewarded so highly, while it contributes nothing back to society? It's nonsensical. But once you accept that finance is kind of ridiculous (and compl…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania - this one lasted only 3 years though
Post reply on HN