Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was surprised when google has agreed to implement the capabilities model for Chrome. I would guess that asking the user for permission to access the microphone would not sit well with google. In smartphones they own the OS so they can ignore wasm's security model as much as they like.
I feel there’s a bit of a disconnect here between Google’s Ads division who are looking to basically do the bare minimum to avoid getting repeatedly spanked primarily by the EU but also now with talk of a breakup in the US and most other parts of Google who I say this entirely unironically are by far the best of all major options with regards to security in both the browser and their public cloud offerings. I’d even…
This is true, but unfortunately in the negative sense: both are as insecure as each other, i.e. pwned. [1]
[1] https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/14344-cellebrite-premium-ju...