Live data from Hacker News

Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark'

theverge.com

311–320 of 1001 posts

Re: Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark'

#311

When I watch the trailer, it feels very cringe. I can absolutely see what they're going for- something like "you're iPad contains the power of all these cultural tools", but visually that connection isn't there. It just looks like "Hooray! Culture has been destroyed, now there is only iPad!"

I took the message that all that culture is now available in an even slimmer form factor. This is the problem with art. Unambiguous messaging is impossible as one casts a wider net of interpretation

> This is the problem with art.

Sorry, but this polished piece of corporate messaging is anything but art. It's at best shiny kitsch.

Re: Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark'

#312
post #280

> missed the mark It didn’t! It is a good clip. It accurately shows how tools are being replaced with digital and cloud. It’s a violent process and precious things get destroyed along the way. It totally hit the mark. But true, it doesn’t make people want to go grab an ipad, so I get why they don’t want to use it.

> It accurately shows how tools are being replaced with digital and cloud.

No it doesnt, it shows thats what Apple thinks which is the whole problem here.

Re: Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark'

#313

When I watch the trailer, it feels very cringe. I can absolutely see what they're going for- something like "you're iPad contains the power of all these cultural tools", but visually that connection isn't there. It just looks like "Hooray! Culture has been destroyed, now there is only iPad!"

I took the message that all that culture is now available in an even slimmer form factor. This is the problem with art. Unambiguous messaging is impossible as one casts a wider net of interpretation

[deleted]

Re: Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark'

#314

I like it. You throw away all your hard-earned, expensive instruments, tools, and crush them to be sure. You then go buy an iPad, and the circle is complete: You're now a next-generation Apple consumer! Just turn on YouTube kids and watch slime videos for the rest of your life. Reject culture, consume the slop.

Still less dystopian than the vision pro with a dad running around his kids with a walled-garden-camera-helmet.

Once may have been a mistake, twice means there's some psychopath marketing VP at the helm OR a joker trying to see far they can go before somebody actually watches ads they're doing before they go live.

Re: Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark'

#315

I think the part that was really upsetting is they crushed real good objects. After all of that talks about climate friendly. They could have crushed 3D renderings and up the clip with “rendered on iPad. No harm was done on real objects.” And that would have been a good ad.

>I think the part that was really upsetting is they crushed real good objects. After all of that talks about climate friendly. Considering how much global e-waste and environmental damage, companies like Apple(and others of their size) are responsible for with their products, destroying a few objects for an ad is like spitting in the ocean in the scheme of things. People complaining about the waste generated from thi…

For real, if Apple actually cared about the environment they'd release new models every several years instead of several times yearly.

They'd allow you to upgrade the RAM in your MacBook instead having to replace the ENTIRE machine!

Re: Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark'

#316
post #296

I think the part that was really upsetting is they crushed real good objects. After all of that talks about climate friendly. They could have crushed 3D renderings and up the clip with “rendered on iPad. No harm was done on real objects.” And that would have been a good ad.

>"And that would have been a good ad." No it would not. It would still be as disgusting as it is now.

Why? I don’t understand how this ad triggers emotions beyond the waste of physical objects

Re: Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark'

#317
post #30

Good, the ad was really disturbing. An ad is just an ad and not the biggest deal in the scheme of things but that was really unpleasant to watch. For me, it was the visual of needless destruction and waste as much as the meta-message.

What baffles me the most is the choice to include human figurines (the bust, the statue, the smiley right at the end). The imagery of human figures getting crushed is going to look disturbing even to the least environmentally conscious viewers.

Re: Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark'

#319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really interesting to consider that this might be one of the few incidents that Shintoists, or at least "cultural Shintoists," have gotten offended at a western production. Makes me wonder if this is why Apple went out of their way to apologize for the ad. I think if this ad just had non-culturally-specific backlash, they would've simply moved on. But because this impacted a specific market's sensibilities, maybe the…

I have seen recently a documentary about Japanese food, and an interesting fact was that the chefs at some big Japanese restaurant had a special decorated grave, in some nice yard, in which they deposited their old kitchen knives, when those were so worn out that they could no longer be used. They felt that it would be disrespectful to just dump somewhere the main tools of their work, after they had used those every…

This is a beautiful sentiment.

Re: Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark'

#320
post #314

I like it. You throw away all your hard-earned, expensive instruments, tools, and crush them to be sure. You then go buy an iPad, and the circle is complete: You're now a next-generation Apple consumer! Just turn on YouTube kids and watch slime videos for the rest of your life. Reject culture, consume the slop.

Still less dystopian than the vision pro with a dad running around his kids with a walled-garden-camera-helmet. Once may have been a mistake, twice means there's some psychopath marketing VP at the helm OR a joker trying to see far they can go before somebody actually watches ads they're doing before they go live.

Twice means this is really the company vision, not just a bad marketing officer.
Post reply on HN