[deleted]
AI-generated sad girl with piano performs the text of the MIT License
311–320 of 389 posts
Re: AI-generated sad girl with piano performs the text of the MIT License
#312Current top 2 is hilarious: https://suno.com/song/c15f0251-fbac-4a30-a3e1-002dbc78cb79
That's just downright silly.
Re: AI-generated sad girl with piano performs the text of the MIT License
#313Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hmm, I think a rambling song form would have been a better fit.
I beg to differ, here's the nu metal version: https://suno.com/song/edea40ab-c41f-46e4-908f-a511b9ab311e I almost feel compelled to take action against the corruption and crookedness.
Mine similar try at different known speech: https://suno.com/song/01309f49-463f-4906-8399-f1f4fe3c6726/
Re: AI-generated sad girl with piano performs the text of the MIT License
#314Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If it was your buddy's sister doing this rendition No. She is sapient and has thoughts and feelings that need taking into account. I would be more likely to disregard minor negatives in favour of any positive words I could find. When AI is on the same level I personally will be more mindful of how my words affect its feelings, sure, until that time AI music will get honest reviews from me. So far I've seen a whole…
So that means, let me get this right, the real you is the one that likes to make cruel remarks and practice being hurtful any chance you get? Do I have it right? I like to think I can be decent even when not required to, even when it won't come back to me.
Huh? The commenter explicitly states their compassion for a human person would compel them to be nice about an obviously bad song.
If the "real me" is a person who can perceive the difference between good and bad things, and also show a bit of decency about it, then yeah, I'd like that to be the "real me."
Feigning liking something to be polite doesn't make the thing good, and that doesn't mean anyone is an asshole either. Ugh.
Re: AI-generated sad girl with piano performs the text of the MIT License
#315Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure if writing the prompt is the human element because an AI can easily write prompts. I think a stronger human element is in the training data (while that training data isn't dominated by AI generated content itself).
> AI can easily write prompts All our current AIs need prompts to produce content. So, you'd need to enter a prompt so that AI can produce a prompt for you. But I guess you could develop some variant which just generates prompts in a cycle. But most of the generated prompts will pretty bad, so it will in turn produce heaps of crap. That's where the human element is still needed - try a prompt, evaluate the result, tw…
There's way more human input in the training data than in the prompt is my point, many orders of magnitude more. Of course there needs to be something to start some chain, but that's like saying a human needs to press "deploy" or "start", it applies to any tool. Even a perpetual motion machine needs someone to start it.
Re: AI-generated sad girl with piano performs the text of the MIT License
#316Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is your comment as a song: https://suno.com/song/c974b1ca-c69e-47a9-994c-9172fae52927
If they didn't require an account to be able to create a song, I would have started an epic AI song battle right here and and right now :-p
You know what else you can do... google an existing song and copy the lyrics then make it make a version. It is HILARIOUS! https://suno.com/song/52a61a54-e25b-438a-908e-01074e6b75fa/
Re: AI-generated sad girl with piano performs the text of the MIT License
#317Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not the parent but here's one article: >After the release of The Jazz Singer in 1927, all bets were off for live musicians who played in movie theaters. Thanks to synchronized sound, the use of live musicians was unnecessary — and perhaps a larger sin, old-fashioned. In 1930 the American Federation of Musicians formed a new organization called the Music Defense League and launched a scathing ad campaign to fight the…
well: > live musicians who played in movie theaters and it wasn't about recorded music, but mechanical pianos
No, it was about recorded music, as the article says. The movie made use of the Vitaphone sound system. The claim was about musicians protesting the introduction of recorded music.
Re: AI-generated sad girl with piano performs the text of the MIT License
#318Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are already worth very little if more than one party can produce them at the push of a button.
They made it illegal to produce exact replicas of Frozen at the push of a button; they could make AI illegal too. Except, the only reason it's illegal to copy Frozen is that it gives rich people less money. Generative AI gives rich people more money, so if anything, it'll be illegal not to use it.
It's not an apt analogy, unless you think that the production of generative images will be restricted to a few parties (because that is what copyright does, it restricts the right to copy to the originator).
And then if it was restricted to a few parties, they still have to compete with human artists, they can't just charge whatever.
Re: AI-generated sad girl with piano performs the text of the MIT License
#319isn't the pronunciation wrong for sublicense and noninfringement?
Humans aren't perfect. It's what gives us our unique little quirks. Same as AI at this stage of its growth. It won't make such silly little mistakes tomorrow.
That's the whole problem of inference: it's just wrong outside of the trivial cases.
Humans are not limited to inference-based reasoning.
Re: AI-generated sad girl with piano performs the text of the MIT License
#320A lot has been said, but I haven't seen specific mention of the ramped up instrumentation for the capitalized portion of the text.
I wonder if that generally reproduces, and if you can guide it to bounce back and forth between modes with punctuation, either normal or as encoded annotations (invented for the prompt).