Live data from Hacker News

LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees

npr.org

311–320 of 336 posts

Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees

#311

The most surprising thing is that there's people who think LinkedIn used to be good. It was built by spamming people and grabbing contact books without consent. It's always been trash.

It was trash, but dealing with recruiters has always been, and keeping professional network into a separate space was the saner thing to do. In that sense, I think it worked as intended: people would only need to react to recruiting mail, and that only during the spans they cared about moving careers. The whole "tell your life on linkedin !" promotion pushed by Microsoft clearly degraded that part.

yeah, the most useful resource wasn't even the recruiters (which was occasionally helpful, but none of my career roles were gained through LinkedIn Recuiters). Having a way that wasn't twitter to connect and talk with old co-workers and colleague was invaluable.

My last role was gained by reaching out to a colleague I haven't talked to since college and asking about the role I applied to, and he was nice enough to give me a referral (I honestly wasn't expecting a referral. it was easily 5+ years since we last interacted, didn't talk that much in college, and I wasn't the best student to begin with). I doubt he posted his roles on Facebook so I never would have thought to contact him otherwise.

Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees

#312
post #89

I really admire the creative bullshit these execs come up with, AI can't compete: "This means adapting our organizational structures to improve agility and accountability, establishing unambiguous ownership and driving improved efficiency and transparency through reduced layering".

I'm all for criticizing empty corpo talk, but that quote is actually pretty reasonable and not empty. They are just saying that they are simplifying their organizational chart so that they don't have teams with overlapping responsabilities. It's just a polite way to say "we noticed that we had 2 teams doing the same thing so we merged them and dropped the resulting excess headcount".

reading it closely it exemplifies everything wrong with the current job market:

> adapting our organizational structures

"free money is gone so we need to downsize"

> to improve agility and accountability,

"we don't have money nor time to nurture juniors. they are gone"

> establishing unambiguous ownership

"We're dropping risky products and specializing towards the most profitable features, ".

> and driving improved efficiency and transparency through reduced layering".

"we're making the remaining workers work more to make up for the people we let go. And cutting out some key managers, producers, and middlemen that will slow things down in the process".

I honestly see is as corpo talk to justify all the usual things that happening as of late.

Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees

#313
post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> that quote is actually pretty reasonable and not empty It does have an actual discernible message, which puts it above a lot of other corporate gobbledygook. But it's still corporate gobbledygook that requires careful deciphering to understand what it says. I don't consider it reasonable at all. It's slightly meaningful word vomit.

There can be several reasons why they (and their employees) would want that though. Being very honest is not a positive in this case. Duplicate work and ambiguous ownership is fuzzy and unclear. They won't come out and say "we overhired and now we are shedding our deadweight" because no one wins with that more crude statement. The least you can do for the laid off employees in this situation is try and not make it ha…

>They won't come out and say "we overhired and now we are shedding our deadweight" because no one wins with that more crude statement.

to be frank, we should probably stop pretending they "overhired". That term implies that these MBAs were somehow blindsided by the imminent recession that analysts have talked about as far back as 2020 and that this wasn't an intentional strategy to maximize growth while labor was "cheap" (or at least, the money to hire labor).

This was all calculated and most companies still came out of this larger than when they entered the pandemic. It was all calculated and workers were nothing more than expendable pawns. Not much we can do about it without stronger labor laws, but that's a multi-decade battle.

Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees

#314
post #286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If this adds a humorous twist on it for you, I saw someone describe it as like a dating site except it’s women trying to contact men and men ghosting them.

I know a girl that uses LinkedIn for dating. She lives in Asia, so maybe they have a different LinkedIn culture.

Or a different dating culture.

Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees

#315

The most surprising thing is that there's people who think LinkedIn used to be good. It was built by spamming people and grabbing contact books without consent. It's always been trash.

I dunno, it literally got me to a 180k salary (Eastern Europe based so astronomical) just by me having a profile there. I didn’t have to find a job since 2015 thanks to it. You might argue that the feed is shit, but to me it’s normal human behavior trying to stand out and abusing everything that you can (including feed algos), so I just don’t look at it. I’ll be forever grateful to LinkedIn and I would never be in th…

So this has to be a US remote job, right?

Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees

#317
post #315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I dunno, it literally got me to a 180k salary (Eastern Europe based so astronomical) just by me having a profile there. I didn’t have to find a job since 2015 thanks to it. You might argue that the feed is shit, but to me it’s normal human behavior trying to stand out and abusing everything that you can (including feed algos), so I just don’t look at it. I’ll be forever grateful to LinkedIn and I would never be in th…

So this has to be a US remote job, right?

Yup!

Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees

#318

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I dunno, it literally got me to a 180k salary (Eastern Europe based so astronomical) just by me having a profile there. I didn’t have to find a job since 2015 thanks to it. You might argue that the feed is shit, but to me it’s normal human behavior trying to stand out and abusing everything that you can (including feed algos), so I just don’t look at it. I’ll be forever grateful to LinkedIn and I would never be in th…

That’s amazing. I’ve never heard such praise for LinkedIn unless it was a sponsored comment.

Unaffiliated completely. Maybe it’s just different here, but I’ve got a lot to thank LinkedIn for.

Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees

#319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I dunno, it literally got me to a 180k salary (Eastern Europe based so astronomical) just by me having a profile there. I didn’t have to find a job since 2015 thanks to it. You might argue that the feed is shit, but to me it’s normal human behavior trying to stand out and abusing everything that you can (including feed algos), so I just don’t look at it. I’ll be forever grateful to LinkedIn and I would never be in th…

Wow interesting! I've being using LinkedIn since it first started, and honestly this is first time I have heard a positive story that is not written by MS or LinkedIn staff or related people. I guess a broken clock can be right 2 times a days. Still won't touch LinkedIn with a 10 feet pole since the MS take over.

A lot of my friends and coworkers from Eastern Europe share my sentiments. Every job I’ve had was due to being recruited via LinkedIn without me lifting a finger, starting from 1k euros gross per month, up until 15x that.

Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees

#320

Has anyone else noticed that LinkedIn is turning into a shitty social media platform? Memes and videos are now being posted. I used to get decent use from it but stopped updating my profile because the site is cancer. Full of self patting on the back and people adding me to “grow their network”. Recruiters contacting me with “perfect fit” position in languages not on my profile. Can someone please develop hacker news…

For me the last nail in the coffin was showing unfiltered images of human remains - from the latest middle eastern conflict. No trigger warning, no NSFW filter, nothing. That's unacceptable.
Post reply on HN