Live data from Hacker News

Closing a 30 pixel gap between native and web

blogs.windows.com

311–313 of 313 posts

Re: Closing a 30 pixel gap between native and web

#311
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you see decades of Windows version after Windows version, each billing itself as "the fastest Windows ever!" and each having higher minimum system requirements than its predecessor, two conclusions are inescapable: 1. The Redmond wizards have devised a method to make software run faster and all it requires is faster hardware. 2. Microsoft is in bed with hardware manufacturers.

Modern Windows PCs feel very noticeably snappier and more responsive than older ones. For all my complaints about Windows, that certainly isn't one. I've had to go back and work on old XP boxes, and that is not a pleasant experience. Admittedly a good chunk of that is SSDs, and better hardware plays a role. But hardware was going to get better anyways regardless of Windows - at least they didn't use the better hardwa…

> Modern Windows PCs feel very noticeably snappier and more responsive than older ones

If you run the same version of windows on both PCs, yes.

Re: Closing a 30 pixel gap between native and web

#312

Alternative title: now your web apps, just like your native apps, can have unpredictable drag/resize/snap/double click to maximize behavior! Ugh. I wish apps would leave reusable consistent system UI elements alone. Has Adobe gotten around to making their title bars DPI-aware yet? Every app that tries this gets at least something wrong. Let's take a look on a random sampling of native-ish Windows apps: Discord (Elect…

> Chrome [bias: I work on Chrome]: Gets the important bits right.

Sigh. Titlebar highjacked, no menubar, small scrollbars, gray on gray (this is a "modern UI" pandemic).

Re: Closing a 30 pixel gap between native and web

#313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not really, I’d say VS Code is the only electron app that can stand up to native apps. It’s not the best, but it’s pretty good. Now, for electron, it’s certainly not a compliment. From electron apps I’ve used, only VS Code is great, Discord is good, and everything else is just really, really bad. It’s apparently extremely hard to use electron and have something close to decent performance.

Right, sorry, I meant back-handed for Electron. I have used VS Code a bit for a class, but am usually an Emacs user.

Hah, nah. Electron gets no compliment at all, backhanded or otherwise. When almost no one can create an app on it that doesn't suck, there are deep issues.
Post reply on HN