Live data from Hacker News

You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

mastodon.technology

311–318 of 318 posts

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#311

If they can trigger a "video fired" message in the analytics, that's one more "Person viewed our video" they can show to a potential advertiser. That's all it's about, not the end user's experience.

Yes, but unlikely. Its usually a deal with a 3rd-party that gives the guaranteed revenue based on views per week/month.

And yet everyone knows that those views are absolutely worthless. Who is paying for that? Who thinks this is a good use of their ad budget?

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#312
post #114

I feel like these are “somebody got a promotion” patterns. Basically, somebody was able to “prove” to Higher-Up Managers that $X number of these videos were “watched” or “engaged with” (or whatever today’s BS lingo is), and therefore the business “benefited” in some way by “reaching” more people. Profit? In reality, at least in my case, what happens is: (1) I say “WTF!?!?”, (2) I make a mental note to never ever visi…

Sort of related - is geeksforgeeks the new experts-exchange?

What's the story on experts-exchange?

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#313
post #35

The worst offender for this, in my opinion, is Wikia (sorry, "Fandom™"). There is zero attempt to make the autoplaying content at all relevant to the wiki in question, and it generally isn't even advertising anything, it's just... crap. It seems like they're desperately trying to believe they have a social network on their hands rather than a collection of disparate knowledge bases, and they're trying to sell this no…

If I remember correctly, if you make an account with them, or sign in with Google or whatever, it lets you turn off the video nonsense.

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#314

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm to the point I'd like to see them go 501c3 nonprofit. Admit defeat. Get used to just making a barely livable income, like the rest of us. Stop begging. Stop the obnoxious ads. Stop the shady subscription schemes. Enough with the .99 cent for six week promos. We obviously don't value you enough to give your access to our debit cards. Newspapers you lost the war. The sooner you realize it the better. Follow the PBS…

I don't think tech workers are making barely livable incomes.

One data point here. Floating ok most months while otherwise doing well.

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#315
Here is a partial fix. I have Firefox set to block autoplay vids, and I also created a bookmarklet (look it up) that removes video elements from the web page. If you see a video playing, you can click on the button in your bookmark toolbar to execute javascript to kill the video. It leaves the video player visible, but it is now empty: it does not use bandwidth and it does not distract you.

Here is the javascript. To use this, you need to create a button on your bookmarks toolbar, and add this as the URL:

javascript:var x = document.querySelectorAll("video");var i;for (i = 0; i One way to use this bookmarklet is to make a new button by dragging (say) this page's URL to your toolbar, then editing it to set the url to above, and renaming it to FixVid.

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#316
News sites don't view people as "users" but as "pageviews". Clickbait and SEO drives pageviews, and you monetize pageviews by getting the highest payment per impression.

This obv comes at a long term branding cost - but only large brands like New York Times can really afford to care about the long term. Most news sites are commoditized and barely surviving these days =/

I don't agree with the practice, but I also kind of understand why it's there.

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#317
post #301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Midlands, city suburb. My house is better than my parents where I grew up to start with, my car is electric, I have free electricity from the sun, a TV larger than anyone could imagine back then (with films for £1 with the same quality as a cinema), I can communicate with almost anyone on the planet, via video, for free (including free translation), I can buy a computer like on Star Trek that I can talk to for £20, l…

Thanks for sharing! I'm happy it worked out for you. At the same time, I wonder if this is a bit of survivorship bias? I'm sure there are many people who do manage to live better than their parents, but is that common or the exception? I was raised by a single parent who was in the "working poor" class, who managed to own their own home. I am a bit disappointed that it would be far more difficult for me to own a home…

But homes today are much better, they have inside toilets, central heating, etc.

The cost of rent and a mortgage seem similar, is the problem a deposit, or the cost per month?

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#318

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm to the point I'd like to see them go 501c3 nonprofit. Admit defeat. Get used to just making a barely livable income, like the rest of us. Stop begging. Stop the obnoxious ads. Stop the shady subscription schemes. Enough with the .99 cent for six week promos. We obviously don't value you enough to give your access to our debit cards. Newspapers you lost the war. The sooner you realize it the better. Follow the PBS…

Right. The issue is twofold - in the internet era, the marginal utility of any additional news source is near zero. Sure, you might cross-check an article once in a blue moon, but most people consume news through a link that was sent to them by someone inside their bubble. And once they read the headline, there's 0 reason to click to another link with the same story ever again. So the links might as well be hosted in…

The New Yorker has always had high quality investigative journalism (albeit with varying levels of left leaning bias depending on the writer) in my opinion, and seems to be quite doing quite well.
Post reply on HN