Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Renames to Meta

about.facebook.com

311–320 of 1001 posts

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#311
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It isn't the users, it's the platform and underlying philosophy of the business. They are factory-farming humans' attention; it's no wonder the result is dystopian.

I see this sentiment posted often on HN but I've seen no social media that didn't eventually become toxic or that didn't feed on human attention, this website included. What good is a platform if nobody pays attention to it? And if people are paying attention to it, how do you plan to prevent them from fighting, competing with each other over every little thing, and spreading misinformation?

You provide enough value without over reaching to gobble up the planet's engaged time. You know massive ad engines which make the social media concept profit driven will not stop existing as a driver for the metaverse. We would need to pay to play in this space or accept a terrible freemium model which is likely to cause unintended consequences. The worst outcome would be a combination of both.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#313
post #108

My god, if you get it, you get it. They are going all in on metaverse / have decided that the future of oculus is the primary long term bet, not facebook itself. And they have the money to make it so. This is incredibly scary, and probably a good investment.

My kneejerk reaction is this will probably waste a lot of their money without much traction. But I'm also happy about Facebook wasting a bunch of their money...

My kneejerk reaction is that some projects with "meta" in the name might get into legal troubles out of the blue.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#315
post #305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Netflix got shoved into this for no reason. It does not fit as "Big Tech".

Well I don’t think the acronym for Facebook Amazon Apple Google would’ve been palatable

Next thing, you'll be telling me my Lettuce, Guacamole, Bacon, and Tomato sandwich is in poor taste.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#316
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

VRChat seems to have landed on something close to the right balance of whatever it takes to make it happen. It's apparently easy enough for someone to make a whole meme world for an event in the news in time for it to be relevant: https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2020/11/9/21557029/four-season... The video in the initial tweet is up to 2.1 million views: https://twitter.com/thecoopertom/status/1325710953305026560?... VR…

Facebook will try to buy VRChat.

1000% this, it's only a matter of time.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#317
post #257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it FB or social media and big tech in general? I'm confused by the laser focus on FB all of a sudden.

> I'm confused by the laser focus on FB all of a sudden. You have to look at in the context of the 2016 election. Once it was discovered that the winning team utilized Facebook in a way the losing team had no concept of (or more likely they simply didn’t use said concept as effectively), Facebook has been singled out and targeted by most media outlets for being evil and in need of strict government regulations, to pr…

Your reasons are valid but way too U.S.-centric for me. I look at FB (the global company) in a global context and am shocked and disgusted at their "profits yes, responsibility no thanks" approach in, say, most non-English speaking countries around the World.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#318

If there is going to be a metaverse, I'm not sure I want Facebook to own it. It's like a bad sci-fi pulp story. Given their investment and research, I wonder if they should open it all up (even if contradictory to short-term gains in ad revenue) so it has a chance to grow? Federate it a bit more than they are comfortable with, to at least give it a chance. I could see this flubbing out hard otherwise. I'm personally…

That's what I wonder. Early VR adopters/technologists hate what happened to Oculus and there aren't a lot of newcomers to that market. I don't think cheaper headsets are going to fix that in the near future so I don't know whom they're targeting. Seems risky to lean into something where the experts already think you screwed up.

I would argue that early adopters/technologists of VR are comparable to PC gamers and Quest adopters are comparable to console gamers.

Both have a purpose, both are subsets of the same demographic... but both vote very differently with their wallets.

Personally, I don't mind FB taking over the casual market. There are still alternatives and the technology will advance faster with such a big company behind it.

That being said, I won't be touching the Metaverse unless I can't avoid it.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#320

My god, if you get it, you get it. They are going all in on metaverse / have decided that the future of oculus is the primary long term bet, not facebook itself. And they have the money to make it so. This is incredibly scary, and probably a good investment.

Not a chance. I've been wrong about a lot of things tech, probably even most things, but this isn't something I think most people want. Metaverses have always been niche. Most people don't like things attached to their head. Remember 3D TVs? But, perhaps you and they are right. For the first time in my life, I honestly feel like 'if this is the future, I want no part in it.' Please don't take this as like, suicidal o…

You are right. Pride comes before a fall, and Zuck thinks he is better than Cook, Musk, Bezos, by building the multiverse he will restore his place as the greatest technologist of our time
Post reply on HN