Live data from Hacker News

Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

everestpipkin.github.io

311–320 of 410 posts

Re: Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

#311
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is not fair at all. Protest turned to riots, literally burning down police stations. Police action wasn't until much later, and they were perfectly fine with the daytime, civil unrest. During the evening, the 'protestors' went home and the agitators came out to fight police, and that's that. When people are looting every store on a street, the police have no choice but to physically move in. There are very few o…

Let's talk about these instances of police violence then [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. You can pick any one of them. What is the police's justification for them, other than to further confirm how much of a police state we live in. [1] https://twitter.com/imactuallynina/status/126691262719377408... [2] https://www.businessinsider.com/nypd-officer-shoves-woman-ge... [3] https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/30/us/minneapolis-protests…

I don't quite agree with your logic.

You're legitimising mass violence, and then condemning those trying to stop it, who in some instances might step too far.

A police Officer and others have been killed, the riots are spreading and it's obviously a problem.

There are riots in major cities - fairly aggressive violence and widespread property destruction.

This absolutely necessitates a physical response by police.

There is no way around that.

To expect absolutely perfectly defined behaviour in a perfect legal sense from some people in a situation, and then to completely ignore the violence by others, which is the cause of underlying problem, is some really difficult logic. Obviously the bar is higher one side, and accordingly behaviour is mostly better.

There are thousands of people looting and rioting and destroying things.

The police are responding fairly proportionately.

The 'daily protests' it seems are going fairly well, peacefully, but the evening situations are basically just riots.

As for your 'examples' ...

If police are slashing tires and tazing people arbitrarily there's no excuse for that, they should be punished.

But a woman was 'shoved'? Why does anyone think we have the right to physically or verbally assault government workers or anyone else, and for there not to be some kind of reaction, and in some cases overreaction, that is frankly, somewhere in the range of proportional, and not a big deal. We didn't see exactly what happened, but there is clearly a physical confrontation going on, while I wouldn't support at all an officer just arbitrarily shoving someone, there's a lot on that table to discuss.

The 'press officer arrested'. This again, I don't think is a story. In a riot, if police are asking people to move somewhere, and they don't, it's very reasonable for people to get detained for a few minutes as they are moved out of the way. In fact, that's a pretty 'civil' example of unrest and the management of it. I don't know all the details actually, but as police are clearing a riot scene of mass violence, having to temporarily detain some people seems reasonable.

There's also the issue of a 'freelance journalist' hit with pellets or something along those lines. A lot of people were hit with pellets - just because someone is carrying a camera, does not give them some kind of legal immunity. Again, we're missing details - if she was standing out of the way, where she was clearly not participating and the cops just 'shot her way' for no reason, well, that's bad. On the other hand, if she's thick into the riot and pellets came her way, well then I think it seems rational, if tragic, that this would be the outcome.

If those thing were happening without any riots or legitimate need to be respond, then it would be really bad, but in the context of literally trying to suppress riots, that's not a 'police state' - that's literally just police dispersing a riot and getting people to go home or indoors.

Already a Police Officer has been killed, one protestor has been killed purposefully, and another killed while accidentally dragged behind a vehicle? And there's probably a billion or so in property damage and lives ruined? This is serious stuff, far beyond the legit protests we're seeing mostly during the daytime that nobody has a problem with.

Re: Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

#312
post #304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Name one example of this strategy succeeding Uhm... when the 3rd precinct got burned down and George Floyd's murderer faced charges the next day? Cops don't normally face charges for murdering black men in broad daylight, so I don't take the timing of arson and charges as coincidence.

Have you got an actual example? I don't even need to get into the race statistics with regard to police brutality, because the charges aren't even close to settling the matter - and you know it, you've already declared them murderers.

>Have you got an actual example?

Of a cop murdering a black man in broad daylight and not getting charged for it? Hell, here's an example I just pulled up for someone else of a 12 year old black kid being murdered while he played airsoft in the park[0], the cop faced no charges and was subsequently hired by another police department in the same state. It's like paedophile priests getting shuffled around by the Catholics, absolutely absurd.

[0]: http://archive.is/jDQv3

Re: Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

#313
post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a simple static site with no server involved. Everything happens client side. You could turn off your internet while you're using it if you wanted to make sure no data is exposed.

A bad actor could selectively serve a different version to those they want to target.

There's no way to obtain and execute source code that you didn't write and hand-compile for which this risk doesn't exist. (And it applies in its own sense to books, paintings, phone calls from mom, letters from an old mentor, DVDs, rental cars, ...)

Re: Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

#314
post #311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's talk about these instances of police violence then [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. You can pick any one of them. What is the police's justification for them, other than to further confirm how much of a police state we live in. [1] https://twitter.com/imactuallynina/status/126691262719377408... [2] https://www.businessinsider.com/nypd-officer-shoves-woman-ge... [3] https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/30/us/minneapolis-protests…

I don't quite agree with your logic. You're legitimising mass violence, and then condemning those trying to stop it, who in some instances might step too far. A police Officer and others have been killed, the riots are spreading and it's obviously a problem. There are riots in major cities - fairly aggressive violence and widespread property destruction. This absolutely necessitates a physical response by police. The…

You're going out of your way to rationalize innocent people getting hurt because some people in an entirely separate city and incident are looting or causing property damage.

All of the videos and incidents I linked showed 100% from multiple angles that the police were the ones instigating the issue. They shoved a woman out of the way because she was just standing there and sent her to the ER. Journalists were blinded because they were simply doing their job and the police decided to take potshots. You're arguing about 'legal immunity' when we're talking about cops blatantly breaking the law and abusing their privilege as police officers to get away with it. And the reason why this entire incident occurred was because of police murdering someone so obviously that people couldn't look the other way. Maybe you should start by blaming them for instigating this whole mess.

Re: Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

#315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've doxxed my Reddit username on my Apple phone doing that exact thing. The black marker is not opaque, even after a few stripes over the username. You have to do it many more times.

Easier to select an area and delete it from the layer entirely so that a transparent hole is left. Then make sure you cleanup EXIF and other metadata or you may have the original image still in a thumbnail field at reduced fidelity. Free online metadata viewer http://exif.regex.info Powered by FOSS (Perl-based) https://exiftool.org

Do not keep it transparent! The Gimp for example keeps the underlying colour data, and just sets the opacity to 0.

this bug (closed as Expected Behavior) has a demonstration: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/issues/4487

Re: Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

#316
post #250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it's all served in the browser, then simply download the page and use it offline.

In this case thats probably fine. It does remind me of a time when a bitcoin keygen site was declared safe because it didn't make any network requests. Only to find out later that it had a malicious random number generator that generated predictable keys. In this case its possible that the site encodes the data back in to the image but that seems unlikely.

[deleted]

Re: Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

#317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Imagine how much scarier it would be if it wanted to run code natively on your machine, outside the browser sandbox.

I have a many sandbox and virtualization tools at my disposal that are both more comprehensive and flexible than a browser sandbox.

Are you packaging these sandbox and virtualization tools for normies to use from their smartphones?

(Sorry for commenting on you twice in this thread--I promise I'm not trying to follow you around. I'm all about dissecting the quality of a system or toolchain! A false sense of security can be more dangerous than naïveté! Caution and skepticism are often our only protection! Trusting random websites is Not a Good Idea! But, security tools average people can't use are also meaningless here.)

Re: Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

#318
post #311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't quite agree with your logic. You're legitimising mass violence, and then condemning those trying to stop it, who in some instances might step too far. A police Officer and others have been killed, the riots are spreading and it's obviously a problem. There are riots in major cities - fairly aggressive violence and widespread property destruction. This absolutely necessitates a physical response by police. The…

You're going out of your way to rationalize innocent people getting hurt because some people in an entirely separate city and incident are looting or causing property damage. All of the videos and incidents I linked showed 100% from multiple angles that the police were the ones instigating the issue. They shoved a woman out of the way because she was just standing there and sent her to the ER. Journalists were blinde…

"the police were the ones instigating the issue" - absolutely not true.

The reporter shot in the eye and the reporter temporarily detained were literally at riots in Minn. Being at a riot when the police have lawfully asked you to leave is 'instigating'. Literally requiring the police to come and use force to move them, and 'the police are the instigators'? This defies reason.

And the 'shoved' woman in the video walked right up to the police officer and was clearly saying something - I don't think it justifies the response but she was literally instigating a confrontation.

" Maybe you should start by blaming them for instigating this whole mess."

I don't 'blame police' because one of them did something egregious, I blame that officer, just as I don't blame 'Americans' or reasonable 'protestors', for looting, murdering, destroying things - I blame the people doing it.

Re: Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

#319
post #272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a static site running on GitHub pages, over HTTPS, directly out of a linked repo so you can examine the source code. I literally could not imagine a more transparent way to serve this application. The only way an attack vector is possible here is if you think GitHub themselves would maliciously inject an altered version of the code in the repo, and even then you'd be able to see the code and network requests in…

> I literally could not imagine a more transparent way to serve this application. Just distribute the code for local execution? Sure, it's less accessable for the target audience, but it is more transparent. But what else is new? Most users are willing to sacrifice privacy and security for convenience. That's how we got into this whole mess.

Hmm 1. This is local execution 2. What's so secure about a downloaded executable run directly from the OS? It could send information to a remote server just (or more) easily, and less transparently

Re: Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pure speculation can sound rational and thorough, but most often it leads towards the ideas that seem most dramatic and exciting, and that conform to your own preconceptions and prejudices.

I think that's right, but I don't think that speculation doesn't have its uses. The truth is probably somewhere between the speculative extremes, and asking questions about the extremes causes people to look into things, which hopefully eventually lead to the truth and a resolution, both of which are probably nowhere near the extremes.

Well, you asked why you were being downvoted. Stuff that you just make up can be corrosive the the public dialogue.
Post reply on HN