Earlier quoted context omitted.
For English, aside from do/does useless distinguishment, the lack of a gender neutral noun for a person usually make people write in a way "he/she". You could say, "the person" but it's long. And months should be represented as numbers instead of names in spoken languages too which is easier to use and remember to have a globally common form. Also, as a Japanese, I'm not sure if singular and plural forms make much se…
> For English, aside from do/does useless distinguishment, the lack of a gender neutral noun for a person usually make people write in a way "he/she". You could say, "the person" but it's long. You mean "they", used as far back as Shakespear?
The Awful German Language (1880)
311–317 of 317 posts
Re: The Awful German Language (1880)
#312I’m not German but spend a lot of time with Germans who are more often than not fantastic fun. And quite “freigeistlich” I find. This is an excellent German stand-up comedian who plies his trade in London: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=48gV9W9UZHk A curious thing that I have noticed that when Germans speak and write English, they often don’t differentiate between 2 previously mentioned subjects or objects. For exampl…
Yes, sometimes the grammar of German will make obvious something that would be easy to lose in careless translation, but not always. Using an example: Dave and Andy each went to London with a pencil and a book. He forgot it at the train station. Dave und Andy sind mit jeweils einem Stift und einem Buch nach London gefahren. Er hat es im Bahnhof vergessen. Here it is NOT clear who forgot (they are both male), but it i…
Re: The Awful German Language (1880)
#313Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I scratch my head at a society that makes its members memorize such useless information. Such a weird perspective on language and on the agency of societies. There are tons of "useless" things in any language. For instance, why not get rid of all the tenses in English? Do we really need the past progressive? To make English spelling more "logical" (so people need to remember less useless information!), we should ag…
>To make English spelling more "logical" (so people need to remember less useless information!), we should again look to Mark Twain: >> Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld. ( http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/twain.htm ) And we should also look to George Bernard Shaw. He proved that, in English, "fish" can be spelled "g…
"Whenever the subject comes up, someone is sure to bring up […] Shaw's ghoti-- a word which illustrates only Shaw's wiseacre ignorance. English spelling may be a nightmare, but it does have rules, and by those rules, ghoti can only be pronounced like goatee."
Re: The Awful German Language (1880)
#314Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also this bit from Connecticut Yankee "She had exactly the German way; whatever was in her mind to be delivered, whether a mere remark, or a sermon, or a cyclopedia, or the history of a war, she would get it into a single sentence or die. Whenever the literary German dives into a sentence, that is the last you are going to see of him till he emerges on the other side of his Atlantic with his verb in his mouth."
True. German sticks auxillary verbs in the middle of a sentence and main verbs at the end. Knew a guy from Lufthansa who joked that sometimes he would attend lectures with orators delivering long sentences and sometimes wouldn't know what was being referenced until the end of a sentence when the main verb showed up two minutes later.
Re: The Awful German Language (1880)
#315I’m not German but spend a lot of time with Germans who are more often than not fantastic fun. And quite “freigeistlich” I find. This is an excellent German stand-up comedian who plies his trade in London: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=48gV9W9UZHk A curious thing that I have noticed that when Germans speak and write English, they often don’t differentiate between 2 previously mentioned subjects or objects. For exampl…
English has a lot of unwritten rules as well. Which sounds correct? I have a large red ball. I have a red large ball. I imagine german has the same, and I wonder if it's one of those cases. For example, to a german speaker, it would be completely clear that Dave is the one who forgot the book because the first subject mentioned is always the relevant one, or something like that.
It's worth checking out all of his language videos if that sort of thing interests you :)
Re: The Awful German Language (1880)
#316Earlier quoted context omitted.
> For English, aside from do/does useless distinguishment, the lack of a gender neutral noun for a person usually make people write in a way "he/she". You could say, "the person" but it's long. You mean "they", used as far back as Shakespear?
There's none for singular form.
Singular they has been in recorded use since 1375, it's only been the last couple of hundred years people started trying to insist it wasn't valid.
https://public.oed.com/blog/a-brief-history-of-singular-they...
Re: The Awful German Language (1880)
#317Reminds me of this joke, the basis of which seems commonly attributed to Mark Twain but as far as I can find, it not actually from him. Not sure what the original is, but here is one of its many copies floating around: https://www.davidpbrown.co.uk/jokes/european-commission.html
That definitely wasn't Twain. It originated as a letter to the editor (perhaps to the Economist?) and got revised as people passed it around on the internet. Unfortunately I can't now find the article I once read which traced this. Perhaps someone else can conjure it up.