311–312 of 312 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps, but if a geographical area of your country produces most of your food, and contains nearly all of your natural resources, you can't look at the citizens who choose to live there and say "sorry guys, there's too few of you so we're going to ignore your wants and desires". Such is the path to resentment, secession and violent revolution.
>Perhaps, but if a geographical area of your country produces most of your food, As a matter of fact, much to most of our food comes from California. >Such is the path to resentment, secession and violent revolution. Why is ignoring the majority of the people, who produce 2/3 of the GDP, not considered a path to resentment, secession, and violent revolution? That is, why should we in the sane, tolerant, productive, n…