Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're right - the invention you mentioned did not put stores out of business. But there have been inventions and technologies and new business models that have put people out of work before. That's not a controversial fact I think... My point is that if enough of those disruptive technologies get introduced in a small enough time frame to put enough people out of work, then we might see some unexpected pushback.
I wonder whether, instead of the "traditional" software industry feeling the brunt of that push-back, it'll be the robotics industry?
Youth expelled from Montreal college after finding security flaw
301–308 of 308 posts
Re: Youth expelled from Montreal college after finding security flaw
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think what the GP meant was something along the lines of "Unauthorized security testing is indistiguishable from Malicious attack", in the sense that you cannot but expect the administrators of the system in question will react in alignment with their own goals. And you really have no control whether they perceive you as an ally or a threat. Orthogonal to this fact is the question of what happens when an authority…
>"Unauthorized security testing is indistiguishable from Malicious attack" Of course it's distinguishable. Testing comes before attacking, to provide information. The two are otherwise completely unrelated. It'd dead-easy to distinguish between someone poking your fence and someone stealing your jewelery, for example.
If a random male servant is found to have gained unauthorized access to the princess' chamber, torture comes first and beheading comes last. In-between questioning regarding his intentions and the degree of fulfillment is optional.
Re: Youth expelled from Montreal college after finding security flaw
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
>"Unauthorized security testing is indistiguishable from Malicious attack" Of course it's distinguishable. Testing comes before attacking, to provide information. The two are otherwise completely unrelated. It'd dead-easy to distinguish between someone poking your fence and someone stealing your jewelery, for example.
You are willingly missing the point here. It is human nature to assume malicious intention, even if it is wrong. And if there's no a strong motive to provide a due process and investigate, malicious intention will will be assumed. If a random male servant is found to have gained unauthorized access to the princess' chamber, torture comes first and beheading comes last. In-between questioning regarding his intentions…
There is a huge difference between catching someone in the act of breaking in, where it's reasonable to assume malicious intention, and noticing that someone entered and left, where you can see that they didn't do anything malicious.
Re: Youth expelled from Montreal college after finding security flaw
#304This sort of thing scares me. One time I found a security vulnerability in a popular forum I frequented. I emailed the site owner, and he thanked me and fixed it. Later someone else discovered another weakness and used it to post spam; the site owner emailed me asking about it. My initial thought was that he suspected I was the one doing it, but it turned out he was just trying to see if I could help him. That scared…
I wondered about the security of that solution, so I checked some random ID numbers to shockingly find out that about 80% of people didn't change their passwords! (I don't remember if you were actually prompted to change it upon first login, or you just had to do it by yourself). I could log in multiple times from the same IP to different accounts.
I hesitated whether to notify someone about it, or to loan a copy of "Mathematical analysis 1" or sth like that for some 100 people in the middle of the holidays within half an hour. That would be hilarious, but they would inevitably throw me out the university if they found out, so I didn't risk the action, neither notifying anyone due to the horror stories here and there.
Re: Youth expelled from Montreal college after finding security flaw
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
link to zsh story: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3901634
In high school I had to write a long apology essay in part because my computer teacher testified to the principal that the Windows command line is "a high-security area of the computer that students have no business accessing." I tried to explain that she was wrong, but you can guess how well that went.
In high school, I was doing a programming course. I was working on my assignment in the library, when the librarian came in and started yelling at me for hacking. I explained that it was course-work, and she said "Oh, alright then.".
One week later, she came in yelling at me "I've already warned you once about this!", and kicked me out of the library.
* confused-look
Re: Youth expelled from Montreal college after finding security flaw
#306He treaded on thin water and he fell in. He should have asked for explicit permission to start pentesting instead of putting his academic career in a volatile state.
I would have given him a second warning.
Re: Youth expelled from Montreal college after finding security flaw
#307There should really be a Department of Computer Security run by most national governments where people can anonymously report exploits, and that Department takes care of contacting the company or organization. If that group also deals with certain types of personal information that is threatened, there should have 30-60 days to demonstrate that they addressed the vulnerability appropriately, or face penalties. Its re…
The one in my country gets anonymous report exploits for state-run software. Not sure what they do wit them though :)
Re: Youth expelled from Montreal college after finding security flaw
#308I beleive Skytech should hire this bloke for a "and they lived happily ever after" story. It's essentially a win-win for Skytech.