Earlier quoted context omitted.
What about people without cars?
I’m pretty sure EVERYONE is covered under the public system, a levy is added in the car rego fee that is the funding mechanism. You don’t need to be a driver to be covered.
New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices
301–310 of 363 posts
Re: New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
A requirement to obtain renter’s insurance is not an example of the type of fees this legislation is targeting.
It should also be illegal. If I want to risk loss of my personal property that should be my decision to make.
Your building would be fine if you found a renter’s insurance that didn’t cover your own goods (which would cost like $3/year less).
Re: New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
I once wrote code that checks location before hiding/showing the cancel button. It’s really absurd that the nice experience exists on all subscription sites by now but you only get to see it if your state demands it.
Ohh, I need to VPN into nyc or california before trying to cancel my new york times subscription.
Re: New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices
#304Any chance you could lend Mamdani to the UK? We have a vacancy.
Hasn’t Sadiq Khan been a similar story, from a Muslim immigrant family turned popular mayor of the nation’s largest city? Though from what I understand he’s from the more business-oriented center-left, in contrast with Mamdani.
Re: New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I live in a touristy part of the world and effectively all restaurants above baseline level will have a "+7% service +11% tax" line. In Germany and Croatia, there is no % at all, the prices are final and include all taxes and fees by law and no one will bat an eye if you pay straight cash - however I personally always tip around 10%, simply because I was happy about that when I worked in hospitality myself.
When I was in high school my German teacher taught us to tip by default by rounding up and paying with exact change. Is that still a thing when everyone is paying with card?
Paying in cash is still common at German restaurants though.
Re: New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices
#306Just want to add to the pile that The New York Times is notorious for its unsubscription shenanigan
For what it's worth, I just tried cancelling my NYTimes subscription to see if it was still as bad as I'd remembered, and aside from desperately begging me not to leave, it was quite simple. No need to contact support. I wasn't planning to go through with it, but I still got a nice discount for the next year, so.. thanks!
Re: New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I live in a touristy part of the world and effectively all restaurants above baseline level will have a "+7% service +11% tax" line. In Germany and Croatia, there is no % at all, the prices are final and include all taxes and fees by law and no one will bat an eye if you pay straight cash - however I personally always tip around 10%, simply because I was happy about that when I worked in hospitality myself.
When I was in high school my German teacher taught us to tip by default by rounding up and paying with exact change. Is that still a thing when everyone is paying with card?
Let's say the bill says someting between 67€ - 72€, I would round that up to 80€.
Or sometimes (not every time though) when I'm getting a Döner kebab and it's ~7.50€ I'll round that up to the next full €.
Re: New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices
#308Re: New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s not your property they care about. They usually want this because it includes liability insurance if you damage their property or someone else’s, or your negligence causes harm to someone.
But then it should be included in the quoted price, right? It’s mandatory after all.
Re: New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have no context of who you are/your position here, but the responses you're getting seem absurd to me. I just don't understand people placing the blame on you when it should be on your company. Most people in the world are just trying to keep their job - you did it. It wasn't something illegal, it was something that if you didn't do, you would have risked your job and then someone else would have done it anyway.
Because the difference between what he's done and, say, the practice of the people who peddled opioids for a paycheck is one of degree, not kind.
You never lied or went along with something dubious? At least this person is being honest and reflective.