Live data from Hacker News

The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars

independent.co.uk

301–310 of 341 posts

Re: The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars

#301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What percentage of his earnings does represent?

It's still not modest. There's no way in which a $6 million dollar house is "modest". Don't try to launder it through lying with percentages. It's not modest.

> Pretty humble/modest for a guy like that.

Modest was qualified. The statement is accurate. Your objection doesn’t make sense.

Re: The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars

#302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They don't really exist to "fix" problems, they are mostly a band-aid over the structural issues that lead to social problems. The long-term solutions to most of these problems involve policy changes rather than "spot fixes" Non-profits are 12% of GDP, over $3.5 trillion. Excluding hospitals, universities, and churches, leaves over $2 trillion in non-profit expenditures. Of that, about $300 billion comes from the g…

It doesn't surprise men to find we spend trillions on nonprofits and get little in return. There is an enormous amount of corruption. More than forty years ago I knew a woman who was cold calling people to raise money for research into a canine disease. If you donated a dollar, she got fifty cents. Her boss got twenty five cents, the company got their cut, the university took a little, so did the department and the p…

Yes, and it’s not just what you’d call outright corruption. A lot of the people who work at non-profits are family members of wealthy people. If you’re a Fortune 500 CEO and your kid isn’t qualified to become a “captain of industry,” you can donate to some non-profit and get them a job there. It’s a socially acceptable way of dealing with “excess elites.” But the consequence of that is that these non-profits aren’t run in a results-driven way. These CEOs aren’t scrutinizing the numbers of the non-profit their nephew works at versus the non-profit some other CEO’s nephew works at, to see who is helping more people more cost effectively. The result is a kind of soft corruption of organizations that get lots of donor funding through social networks but which don’t use that money very effectively. Not because it is being diverted as such, but because nobody is trying very hard.

Re: The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars

#303
post #96
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Craigslist doesn't make any money from those scams because they don't charge for rental listings. It sucks that it's there, but for them to hire staff to deal with it, they'd have to charge for the rental listings. Right now they rely on volunteers to combat that problem, in the form of legit landlords reporting the scams.

So why not charge for rental listings? i'm sure the number of scams would go down, while posting would still be of good value for someone looking to rent out a $3000/mo apartment.

It’s not what they do, and it’s a crowded market where they don’t really have an edge. If you want well-vetted products, don’t go to Craigslist. They’re just digital classifieds, the tradition is basically “anyone can list them, no one checks them, caveat emptor”.

It’s weird to me they even carry real estate listings, because I’m surprised anyone would trust them with that kind of money on a good you can’t easily self-validate. I wouldn’t spend more than $100 on something from Craigslist if I wasn’t confident that I can judge the quality of it myself.

Re: The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars

#304

The world can't run on random philanthropy. You don't become a billionaire through hard work alone but through exploitation at scale. Tax the richs, or eat them.

so if I make a piece of software and I sell it to 10 million people for 10$ and I'm the only employee who did I exploited?

Re: The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars

#305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> People don’t build new companies after a successful exit to “make even more money.” They absolutely do. I interact with people who do just that. > You're projecting. LOL. The last thing I want to do is start a company or try to make $100's of millions.

Leave money aside—why wouldn’t you want to start a company and build something yourself?

While I do love the idea of building something new and useful, starting a new tech company these days isn't really about building, it's mostly about your ability to sell your story to investors, or your product if you can get that far. And I really really don't like doing sales. I've seen the fundraising process close up and it is most definitely not for me. Half (or more) of what people fundraising for their company say is BS, and I really hate BS.

Re: The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars

#306
Here's another thought: why not charge less? If he's giving away all of this money, the firm is definitely profitable. Charging less for job ads means more job ads. Making it easier to advertise can mean more employed people. (Obviously someone will abuse this good will but the basic economic link is straight-forward.)

Re: The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars

#307

I don't know much about this guy, but I remember reading an interview with him maybe 15 years ago where he was asked if his lifestyle had changed since he came into money and if he bought a new house or anything, and his answer was basically something like: "Not really, and I've already got good water pressure where I'm at, what else do I need?" I can't help but like his attitude.

At heart he seems like one of the good guys in the history of tech.

Although he may have inadvertently destroyed local news by squeezing it of revenue from classified ads (but has since done a lot to fund journalism)

Re: The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars

#309

Craigslist is often held up as an example of a company "doing it right", but what is never mentioned in these posts is that a large portion of their revenue comes from facilitating scams. Around 25% of rooms/apartments I contact are scams, and Craigslist has so far done nothing to prevent these. A common scam is to take pictures from a real estate site of a house that recently sold and advertise it as for rent, but t…

Its the ultimate libertarian paradox.

How can you both preserve peoples rights and also intervene to stop when you subjecivley think something should be regulated?

Re: The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars

#310
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So why not charge for rental listings? i'm sure the number of scams would go down, while posting would still be of good value for someone looking to rent out a $3000/mo apartment.

It’s not what they do, and it’s a crowded market where they don’t really have an edge. If you want well-vetted products, don’t go to Craigslist. They’re just digital classifieds, the tradition is basically “anyone can list them, no one checks them, caveat emptor”. It’s weird to me they even carry real estate listings, because I’m surprised anyone would trust them with that kind of money on a good you can’t easily sel…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN