Live data from Hacker News

Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis

techcrunch.com

301–310 of 383 posts

Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis

#301
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>By the time the "free" electricity has paid for the installation, you'll need to replace it. You are going to have to back this up with credible citations. Otherwise it sounds like skepticism from 2008.

You're right, I ran the numbers years ago. I remain as skeptical as I am for roofing lifetime claims.

Impressive commitment to stale inference from dated data.

Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis

#302

> Still, some of these stories are surprising. Zeb Evans, the CEO of project management and productivity software startup ClickUp, proudly declared on X that he had laid off almost a quarter of his employees — 22% — after rolling out about 3,000 AI agents to do internal work. As someone who is forced to use ClickUp I can tell you that it's not good software. It wasn't good before this layoff and it hasn't improved si…

I couldn't believe how shitty ClickUp was when I was demoing project management software because it came highly recommended. Actually most of them were shitty. Monday, Asana, and all the others I can't remember. Just absolutely dog slow. I am so confused at how people are productive with these apps. By the time things had loaded, I had already forgotten what I was trying to do.

We settled on Basecamp and it is a joy to work with. Super fast keyboard shortcuts and easy navigation to projects. I'm glad we don't need the more exotic features in the other project management software, but if we ever do, it will probably be OpenProject, which was the runner up.

Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis

#304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

why not? I have A Modest Proposal: 1. convince CEOs to create digital twins of themselves with OpenClaw, with voice cloning and deepfakes to handle Zoom meetings. convince CEO to encourage their directs to do the same. 2. convince VCs to do the same for pitch meetings and syncs. 3. keep all the humans as randomized and distracted as possible, so they rely more and more on OpenClaw to run the business. 4. prompt injec…

1985 edition https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wB1X4o-MV6o

Had a meeting where only the AI notetaker showed up and immediately shared this clip with some folks in my org.

Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis

#305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reminds me of the movie "Dark Star" by John Carpenter / Dan O'Bannon. The plot revolves around a talking smart bomb which is programmed to detonate and then gets stuck before being deployed. The crew spends the whole movie trying to reason with the bomb, hoping to talk it out of blowing up at the designated time. The movie is very very bad but if you like B movies it is also very very good.

Is that movie why seemingly every Linux book in the late 90s and early 2000s used "darkstar" as an example hostname?

It was the default slackware hostname, I believe slackware took inspiration from the movie

edit: I was wrong, it was from a Grateful Dead song. https://www.slackbook.org/html/glossary.html

Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis

#306

It’s more than the C-Suite, it’s everyone who no longer has a knowledge specialty. Their domain is shattered and there is nothing left for them because before LLMs all they did anyway was search for companies to contract out an integration to solve a niche problem. 99% of the C-suites/boards are now this. Your IT guy, scrum master, Product lead, integration team, etc. Everyone who’s chosen to NOT understand because t…

> it’s everyone who no longer has a knowledge specialty.

> Everyone who’s chosen to NOT understand because they can offload/contract-away their work and knowledge is under psychosis that LLMs know best.

Right on the money!

These people's ignorance was compensated for by other non-ignorant intelligent people in the organization who actually had knowledge of the domain and tools/techniques for problem-solving. The latter were the ones doing the course-correcting and ensuring things stayed on track for delivery.

With the adoption of AI, ignorance is in the driver's seat viz. "i don't have to know anything since AI will do it for me". I guarantee that a few years down the line when there is enough AI generated messy/obfuscated/wrong code the C-Suites will realize the hole they have dug themselves into and will again look for human engineers to either fix or rewrite the above.

Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis

#308
I've seen director / VP-level folks at a public company point LLMs at a corporate product and essentially ask it "What deficiencies do you see here? Output to a Word document." Then forward the output to engineering management as a product task list. One person did this to the same product more than once in a couple week span without realizing it so there were multiple documents with conflicting issue lists floating around trying to be read and triaged. And the expectation is that this comprehensive analysis was done so easily, product fixes should be just as easy.
Post reply on HN