Earlier quoted context omitted.
Both of those are true assuming the lay offs come from different demographics. You lay off 1100 who are late in their career for younger people who will work more hours for less. You're building the future with new fresh people instead of the "dead weight"
> You lay off 1100 who are late in their career for younger people who will work more hours for less. Yet management always seems to miss the institutional knowledge, and experience, that also walks out the door laying off those 1,100 people 'late in their career'... It's not possible to cram 25 years of experience into two.
Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
301–310 of 1001 posts
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
Both of those are true assuming the lay offs come from different demographics. You lay off 1100 who are late in their career for younger people who will work more hours for less. You're building the future with new fresh people instead of the "dead weight"
> You lay off 1100 who are late in their career for younger people who will work more hours for less. Yet management always seems to miss the institutional knowledge, and experience, that also walks out the door laying off those 1,100 people 'late in their career'... It's not possible to cram 25 years of experience into two.
Hired as a code monkey, fired as a code monkey.
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#303Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#304> Cloudflare expects second-quarter revenue of $664 million to $665 million, obviously $2.5e9ish/yr is substantial in absolute terms ... but that's it? They intermediate half the internet and only capture $7m/day?
I think about investing in Cloudflare but that P/E ratio scares me off every time.
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just your average Thursday in American capitalism!
Should companies be forced to retain talent of a certain age group? Should they be forced to retain less competent people? How do you expect this to work?
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been told that a recession is coming since 2009, when I started investing - there has never been one since then despite all the dire predictions - therefore, my investments are safe
If you had started investing 1 year earlier though?
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#307Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
Both of those are true assuming the lay offs come from different demographics. You lay off 1100 who are late in their career for younger people who will work more hours for less. You're building the future with new fresh people instead of the "dead weight"
Isn’t this illegal?
> The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) forbids age discrimination against people who are age 40 or older.
To answer your question: Probably not. Even so, it is incredibly hard to prove workers 40 and older were laid off as a result of age discrimination.Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#309This is awkward. Exhibit A - September 2025 - "Help build the future" - Cloudflare hires 1111 interns to "help build the future" [ https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-1111-intern-program/ ] Exhibit B - May 2026 - "Building for the future" - Cloudflare lays off 1100 people, about 20% of their workforce to "continue building the future" [ https://blog.cloudflare.com/building-for-the-future/ ] I'll finish on this quo…
Both of those are true assuming the lay offs come from different demographics. You lay off 1100 who are late in their career for younger people who will work more hours for less. You're building the future with new fresh people instead of the "dead weight"